Teaching and Supervision in Counseling
Author ORCID Identifier
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc0740fd
Abstract
We conducted a Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) content analysis of handbooks (N=54) from CACREP-accredited doctoral counselor education and supervision programs. The purpose of this study was to better understand how counselor education programs communicate remediation policies and procedures and what specific elements are included in handbooks. Our findings revealed that while dismissal policies, dispositions, due process, and evaluation procedures were commonly included, there was significant variability in the inclusion of other domains, such as retention policies and definitions of remediation. Notably, only one handbook included all ten documented domains. The study highlights a need for more comprehensive and standardized remediation policies to align with updated CACREP standards. Implications for counselor education programs include the importance of clear delineation of student expectations, the inclusion of both formal and subjective evaluation procedures, and the potential benefits of defining the purpose of remediation to support student development and program consistency.
Public Significance Statement
This content analysis of remediation policies and procedures in doctoral-level counseling program handbooks reveals essential insights into how institutions support student success. Understanding these findings is crucial for educators, administrators, and counselors alike, as they work collaboratively to enhance the effectiveness and fairness of remediation processes in higher education.
Recommended Citation
Salpietro, Lena; Clark, Madeline; and Zacarias, Rosalyn
(2025)
"A Content Analysis of Doctoral-Level Counselor Education Remediation Policies,"
Teaching and Supervision in Counseling: Vol. 7
:
Iss.
3
, Article 1.
https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc0740fd
Available at:
https://trace.tennessee.edu/tsc/vol7/iss3/1