Doctoral Dissertations
Date of Award
12-2001
Degree Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
History
Major Professor
Paul H. Bergeron
Committee Members
Charles S. Aiken, Stephen V. Ash, John R. Finger, William Bruce Wheeler
Abstract
This dissertation examines how anti-Catholic sentiment affected Americans' conduct in, and opinions of, the U.S.-Mexican War of 1846-1848.Chapter One explores how increased immigration and republican ideology allowed anti-Catholicism and nativism to fuse in the late 1830s and early 1840s.Nativists and many evangelical Protestants claimed that the Pope conspired to undermineAmerican liberty by establishing a Catholic stronghold in the West with the help of aJesuit-led army of Catholic immigrants. Moreover, many Americans argued that RomanCatholicism was incompatible with civil and religious liberty, the two hallmark freedoms of republicanism. They pointed to Mexico's political troubles as an example of this incompatibility in action, and pre-war portrayals of Mexico and Catholicism helped to establish a preconception of Mexicans as a Cognitively inferior, superstitious, and lazyrace. Chapter Two analyzes how nativist politicians used incidents relating to the war,such as the appointment of Catholic chaplains to the U.S. army, to support further their argument that Catholics were subverting the American republic. Contrary to their usual anti-immigrant rhetoric, nativists also supported the annexation of Mexico in its entirety in the name of Manifest Destiny, and for racist and anti-Catholic reasons. Chapter Three,through an examination of sermons, inter-denominational voluntary societies, and newspapers, investigates the interplay between anti-Catholic, evangelical Protestants and the war. Voicing their opinions in republican language, many evangelicals saw the war as a Providential opportunity to evangelize Catholic Mexico with a "pure" gospel. Tothem, the Manifest Destiny of the United States included the spread of Protestantism as is the necessary foundation of republican government. Chapter Four looks at the ,experience of the American invasion force in Mexico. American soldiers, in their observations of Mexican culture, ,mixed racism and religious bigotry with Anglo-Saxonist, republican rhetoric. This denigration fostered a mindset among some that enabled them to commit atrocities, accost priests, and rob and vandalize churches; Usingthe interpretive framework, of anti-Catholicism, Chapter Five examines the All Mexico Debate, treaty deliberations in the U.S. Senate, and the effect of the war's end on nativists and evangelicals. When the war ended, Protestant missionaries streamed into theMexican cession in an attempt to convert Catholics, Indians, and newly-arrived settlers.Certain tenets of American republicanism were brought into play when the overwhelmingly Protestant United States waged war on Catholic Mexico. Located at the middle point in the growth of the antebellum anti-Catholic movement, the U.S.-MexicanWar helped to hone the concept of American republicanism as an ideology that includedAnglo-Saxonism and anti-Catholicism under the greater umbrella of Manifest Destiny.
Recommended Citation
Pinheiro, John Christopher, "Crusade and conquest : anti-Catholicism, manifest destiny, and the U.S.-Mexican War of 1846-1848. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2001.
https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/8568