Political Implications of Medicaid Expansion: A Decision for Five Incumbent Southern Governors Seeking Re-election in 2014 and 2015

Authors

Samuel R. Henninger, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Document Type

Report

Publication Date

5-2016

Abstract

This paper argues that five governors had a greater chance of winning re-election if they opposed Medicaid expansion instead of supporting it before their Republican primary elections. The five governors were Robert Bentley of Alabama, Nathan Deal of Georgia, Phil Bryant of Mississippi, Nikki Haley of South Carolina, and Bill Haslam of Tennessee. First, a summary of arguments for and against Medicaid expansion in the five states is provided. The next part of the paper seeks to develop a political justification for the decision to oppose Medicaid expansion before the Republican primary elections. This paper concludes that, in the five states, opposing Medicaid expansion is a better political decision because the Republican primary electorate rewards conservative candidates, Medicaid expansion’s connection to President Obama makes it difficult for a Republican governor to support, and a strong argument for Medicaid expansion—its cost-effectiveness—is difficult to explain to voters.

Recommended Citation

Henninger, Samuel R., "Political Implications of Medicaid Expansion: A Decision for Five Incumbent Southern Governors Seeking Re-election in 2014 and 2015" (2016). Baker Scholar Projects.
https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_bakerschol/33