An application of R. S. Hartman's axiology to the value system of Augustine

There is a logical difference between an axiological application and a philosophical comparison. While philosophy uses analytic concepts to compare still other analytic concepts, axiology uses synthetic, formal relations to structure and order value phenomena. The three formal relations of R. S. Hartman's axiology, systemic value, extrinsic value, and intrinsic value may be used to scientifically explain Augustine's value system Although Hartman's axiology does have its own metaphysical presuppositions which require careful notice in making an application, it is clear that Augustine's philosophic system can be explained axiologically as an example of systemic value. This is obvious in that each item in Augustine's universe necessarily is completely defined in the mind of God. The concepts of each item of the universe, therefore, are denumerably finite and arranged in a definite order of internal relations structured by and arising from God. Since being and goodness are identical in Augustine's system, and since the more being a creature has the better it is, all value exists in a definite hierarchy. This is precisely the kind of relation termed systemic value in the Hartman system.

However, Augustine himself is not entirely consistent in that he was attempting to combine a moral, existential religious experience with a formal, logical philosophical system. The moral, existential side of his thought--especially in his religious conversion--points strongly toward intrinsic value. Axiology shows clearly how these two diverse strains are at odds with one another by demonstrating that two entirely different kinds of value and, thus, two entirely different kinds of universes are present.