Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. Energy Production from Poultry Waste: Development and Application of an Economic Model to Compare Various Concepts
Details

Energy Production from Poultry Waste: Development and Application of an Economic Model to Compare Various Concepts

Date Issued
August 1, 2008
Author(s)
Dickens, Ricky Everette
Advisor(s)
Atul Sheth
Additional Advisor(s)
Gregory Sedrick
Roy Schulz
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/39706
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether there is a profitable way to recover energy from the poultry waste produced by Seaboard Farms in Chattanooga Tennessee. This study dovetails with an earlier study conducted by the SMARTPARKTMproject, where SMARTPARKTMengineers determined there could be large energy savings through the placement of heat exchangers, and the sharing of hot and cold utilities between companies in that same industrial park. They suggested construction of a Centrally Managed Energy Recovery Facility (CMERFTM) which would incorporate the heat exchangers to match heat streams between the two plants, which are reasonably close together, in order to meet their steam and cold utility requirements. This paper explores the options for employing a power or fuel generation system in addition to this, using as fuel the poultry waste materials (meat, feathers, bones) from the poultry plant. In order to do this, data from technical publications were analyzed and the options narrowed to four possibilities, in two main categories: an indirectly fired gas turbine, utilizing either compressed air (IFGT) or a steam cycle (STC) and a moving bed combustor, an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), and catalytic steam gasification. A technical and economic analysis was carried out on both of these options to determine an ideal candidate for the location, energy market, and fuel source options. From this analysis an economic model was developed for each of the options, and these options were compared through a sensitivity analysis for all of the major factors. This economic model was verified and validated through data from literature sources. Through this careful technical and economic analysis, the IGCC is recommended as the ideal option, due to its reasonable installation costs and flexibility with feedstock. This option proved to be the most beneficial for the cost across the range of variables.

Disciplines
Chemical Engineering
Degree
Master of Science
Major
Chemical Engineering
Embargo Date
August 1, 2008
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

DickensRicky.pdf

Size

1020.6 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

c9f0b5c2f9a646876d41982d08e526fd


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science