Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. Preservice Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Current Notions of Proof in Euclidean Geometry
Details

Preservice Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Current Notions of Proof in Euclidean Geometry

Date Issued
August 1, 2011
Author(s)
Ratliff, Michael  
Advisor(s)
P. Mark Taylor
Additional Advisor(s)
Vena M. Long
JoAnn Cady
Jerzy Dydak
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/19367
Abstract

Much research has been conducted in the past 25 years related to the teaching and learning of proof in Euclidean geometry. However, very little research has been done focused on preservice secondary school mathematics teachers’ notions of proof in Euclidean geometry. Thus, this qualitative study was exploratory in nature, consisting of four case studies focused on identifying preservice secondary school mathematics teachers’ current notions of proof in Euclidean geometry, a starting point for improving the teaching and learning of proof in Euclidean geometry.


The unit of analysis (i.e., participant) in each case study was a preservice mathematics teacher. The case studies were parallel as each participant was presented with the same Euclidean geometry content in independent interview sessions. The content consisted of six Euclidean geometry statements and a Euclidean geometry problem appropriate for a secondary school Euclidean geometry course. For five of the six Euclidean geometry statements, three justifications for each statement were presented for discussion. For the sixth Euclidean geometry statement and the Euclidean geometry problem, participants constructed justifications for discussion.

A case record for each case study was constructed from an analysis of data generated from interview sessions, including anecdotal notes from the playback of the recorded interviews, the review of the interview transcripts, document analyses of both previous geometry course documents and any documents generated by participants via assigned Euclidean geometry tasks, and participant emails. After the four case records were completed, a cross-case analysis was conducted to identify themes that traverse the individual cases.

From the analyses, participants’ current notions of proof in Euclidean geometry were somewhat diverse, yet suggested that an integration of justifications consisting of empirical and deductive evidence for Euclidean geometry statements could improve both the teaching and learning of Euclidean geometry.

Subjects

mathematics education...

secondary school geom...

proof schemes

Euclidean geometry ju...

Disciplines
Curriculum and Instruction
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Teacher Education
Embargo Date
December 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Michael_Ratliff_UT_Dissertation.docx

Size

1.7 MB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

96934a28ae2957ae2ffdb919e691a00a

Thumbnail Image
Name

RatliffMichaeldissertation.pdf

Size

2.37 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

f283420cd95e75d03521c520dbdcfe20


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science