Author ORCID Identifier
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5170-1585
Abstract
It is now a maxim among scholars and policy-makers alike that disaster preparedness needs to involve community-based approaches in order to be effective. These include preparedness strategies in the household. But how do disaster preparedness policies and public discourses define “the household” in the first place? In this article, we explore how particular gendered notions of the household are reproduced in disaster preparedness policies and activities in Japan and the UK. Drawing on historical and cross-cultural analyses, we suggest that household preparedness efforts place the burden of labor on people coded as women—a phenomenon we call “the feminization of preparedness.” Ultimately, we suggest that when disaster policies discuss “the household,” even if they do not explicitly mention gender, there might be a problematic responsibilization of preparedness on women. Calls for the inclusion of marginalized people into disaster preparedness efforts should also be aware of the possibility of overburdening one group over others.
Recommended Citation
Watanabe, Chika and Hanson, Celie
(2022)
"Interrogating Households in Anticipation of Disasters: The Feminization of Preparedness,"
Critical Disaster Studies: Vol. 1
:
Iss.
1
, Article 4.
Available at:
https://trace.tennessee.edu/cds/vol1/iss1/4
Included in
Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, Emergency and Disaster Management Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Human Geography Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Migration Studies Commons, Place and Environment Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Rural Sociology Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Social Justice Commons, Social Work Commons, Work, Economy and Organizations Commons