William G. Brownlow William G. Brownlow Fighting Parson ofthe Southern Highlands By E. Merton Coulter With a New Introduction by Stephen V. Ash The University of Tennessee Press I Knoxville ~ The Appalachian Echoes series is dedicated to reviving and con­ y/ • wee textualizing classic books about Appalachia for a new genera­ tion ofreaders. By making available a wide spectrum ofworks­ from fiction to nonfiction, from folklife and letters to history, sociology, politics, religion, and biography-the series seeks to reveal the diversity that has always characterized Appalachian writing, a diversity that prom­ ises to confront and challenge long-held stereotypes about the region. Copyright © 1999 by The University of Tennessee Press I Knoxville. All Rights Reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. First Edition. The paper used in this book meets the minimum requirements of ANSI! NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 1997) (Permanence of Paper). The binding mate­ rials have been chosen for strength and durability. Printed on recycled paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Coulter, E. Merton (Ellis Merton), 1890- William G. Brownlow: fighting parson of the Southern Highlands I by E. Merton Coulter; with a new introduction by Stephen V. Ash. p.cm. Originally published: Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1937. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 1-57233-050-3 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Brownlow, William Gannaway, 1805-1877. 2. Tennessee, East­ Politics and government. 3. Tennessee, East-Biography. 4. Tennessee, East-History-Civil War, 1861-1865. 5. Reconstruction-Tennessee, East. 6. 10urnalists-Tennessee, East-Biography. 7. Methodist Church­ Tennessee, East-Clergy-Biography. 8. Governors-Tennessee-Biog­ raphy. 1. Title. E415.9B9 C7 1999 976.8'04'092--dc21 [B] 98-40300 Contents Foreword by Durwood Dunn Introduction by Stephen V. Ash I. Crusading in the Southern Highlands II. A New Parson Rides the Circuit III. Personal Journalism IV. Religious Warfare Renewed V. Black Slaves and Mountain Whites VI. Ante-Bellum Politics VII. Secession VIII. East Tennesseeans Rebel against Rebellion IX. In Jail and Out X. A Tour of the North XI. Back in Tennessee XII. A New Governor Seeks Vengeance XIII. The Minority Establishes Itself XlV. The Reign of the Tennessee Radicals XV. The Storm before the Calm XVI. The Like Shall Not Be Seen Again Bibliography Index vii xi 1 17 35 53 84 110 134 154 178 208 235 262 294 325 349 374 401 413 Illustrations 173 facing page 182 frontispiece 5 following page 23 68 76 78 Parson William Gannaway Brownlow Camp-meeting Ecstasy Map of the Brownlow Country J. R. Graves, According to Brownlow "Elder B. Changing Clothes Before the Ladies, After Immersing!" Pictorial Proof that the Sprinkling Form of Baptism is Correct The Hanging of Jacob Harmon and his Son, Henry, by the Confederates A Scene from the Great Smokies of East Tennessee Brownlow at the Southern Loyalists' Convention at Philadelphia facing page 183 Brownlow Entering the Knoxville Jail 190 The Parson's Part in a Touching Jail Scene 193 A Specimen of Brownlow's Handwriting-and Language 198 A Painting of Brownlow in the Tennessee Capitol facing page 384 Knoxville in the Seventies facing page 385 Foreword In 1964, historian George B. Tindall suggested mythology might be the new frontier of southern history, since innumerable efforts to identify a central theme regarding the South had frustrated so many previous schol­ ars. By mythology, Tindall simply meant examining the beliefs, aspira­ tions, ideals, and meanings through which a people identify themselves within some historical context and seek by this controlling generaliza­ tion to give philosophical meaning to the facts of ordinary life, while at the same time defending themselves from outside attack. Under these circumstances, the myth itself becomes one of the realities of history, influencing or shaping the subsequent pattern of behavior for partici­ pants in the folk community. Yet in the new field ofAppalachian studies that emerged in the 1980s, myth has a particularly pejorative connota­ tion, used most frequently as it has been by past observers of the region to fix an invidious and enduring stereotype on the inhabitants. Appala­ chian mythmakers are therefore always frankly suspect-hostile, preju­ diced outsiders pursuing their own agenda for literary recognition or some well-meaning but grossly distorted reform effort. Historian David C. Hsiung is one of the few scholars to explore the role of Appalachian natives in creating their own mythology; his Two Worlds in the Tennessee Mountains: Exploring the Origins ofAppala­ chian Stereotypes offers the interesting scenario of town dwellers in up­ per East Tennessee initially caricatured their more backward rural neigh­ bors in the mountains and hollows. Local color writers were quick to seize on this image, but distorted it even further by representing all Ap­ palachians as possessing the undesired traits that became an enduring national stereotype. Yet no single individual within Appalachia self-consciously cre­ ated a myth both about himself and about his region-East Tennessee­ as did William G. Brownlow. "I would as soon be engaged in importing the plague from the East," Parson Brownlow vehemently declared on February 16, 1861, in the pages of his Knoxville Whig, "as in helping to build up a Southern Confederacy upon the ruins of the American Consti­ tution." Thus the "Parson," as he was commonly called, with character­ istic vituperation and exaggerated rhetoric, lambasted supporters of the vm FOREWORD Confederacy even after East Tennessee was occupied by southern troops, and simultaneously demonstrated why he was among Tennessee's most colorful and controversial political leaders of the nineteenth century. It is perhaps a tribute to the freedom of speech within the Confed­ eracy that Brownlow's paper, and harshly critical editorials, were allowed to continue so long. After he refused allegiance to the Confederate gov­ ernment and fled to the Great Smoky Mountains in November 1861, his press and types were finally destroyed. Found by Confederate scouts, he was returned to Knoxville, where he was briefly placed in jail. Finally allowed to flee to the North in March 1862, Brownlow became an ex­ tremely popular lecturer on behalf of the Unionists of East Tennessee throughout the North. His resulting summary of his trials and tribula­ tions, related with characteristic terrible contumacy and abuse, in between scenes of exaggerated pathos, was published in 1862 as Sketches of the Rise, Progress, and Decline ofSecession; With a Narrative ofPersonal Adventure Among the Rebels and became an immediate bestseller. Widely known under the briefer title, Parson BrownlowsBook, this volume plus his personal speaking engagements fixed an enduring image of both Brownlow and the Appalachian South in the mind of the northern public. E. Merton Coulter's 1937 biography of Brownlow remains the best scholarly biography of the Parson and his times. Brownlow, a "some­ time" Methodist minister, had earlier fought a bitter sectarian battle against the Presbyterians. Ironic in view of his later Unionism, he was a leading defender of slavery, and, in 1858, he debated Abraham Pryne, editor of an antislavery paper, The Central Reformer. In this "forensic disputation," held in Philadelphia in the National Guard Hall, Brownlow defended the peculiar institution as ardently as any southern radical and heaped abuse on abolitionists. Coulter's biography is extremely well written and appropriately humorous in relating the exaggerated rhetoric and energy with which Brownlow assaulted all enemies-democrats, abolitionists, Presbyterians, and, finally, Rebels-in his variously titled Knoxville Whig between 1849 and 1869. Stephen V. Ash's introduction contextualizes Coulter's biography in light of recent historical scholarship, especially noting Coulter's rac­ ism and his reproduction of the tragic myth of Reconstruction so long discarded by modern scholars. Professor Ash astutely notes, however, the discrepancy between Brownlow's personal life and his vituperative rhetoric, a discrepancy which sets the stage for Brownlow's role as an active mythmaker when, as Reconstruction governor of Tennessee, he both wrote the script and played a principal part in a self-conscious po­ litical drama that fixed the image of the loyal mountaineers of East Ten- FOREWORD IX nessee indelibly upon the national consciousness. Parson Brownlow's vigorous, deliberate, and self-conscious mythmaking thus deserves care­ ful scrutiny by all scholars of the Appalachian region that he helped both to define and delineate. Durwood Dunn Tennessee Wesleyan College Introduction Tennessee has had its share of outrageous characters over the years, but none more outrageous than Parson Brownlow. Even today, more than 120 years after his death, merely mentioning his name in the Volunteer State can evoke raucous laughter or bitter curses. The Parson would like that: those are the very responses he loved to evoke in his own day. William Gannaway Brownlow was not only a colorful and contro­ versial historical figure, but also an important one. Born in southwestern Virginia in 1805 and orphaned at age eleven, he became a circuit-riding Methodist preacher and traveled all over southern Appalachia, settling eventually in East Tennessee. In 1839 he took up journalism and politics as editor of the Whig, a newspaper he founded in Elizabethton and later moved to Jonesboro and ultimately Knoxville. By the time of the Civil War, the Whig had eleven thousand subscribers and was widely read within and beyond Tennessee's borders. In 1861 Brownlow emerged as a princi­ pal leader of the East Tennessee unionists, whose resistance to secession plagued the Confederacy. After the war he served as governor ofTennes­ see and ruled the state for four years with a Radical fist of iron. What made the Parson stand out was, more than anything else, his vitriolic tongue and pen. Over the course of his long career he took up many causes. These included not only Methodism, Whiggery, and the Union, but also temperance, Know-Nothingism, and slavery. His favorite method of promoting those causes was to chastise and ridicule his oppo­ nents, and few men could do so with as much venomous wit as he. Bap­ tists, Presbyterians, Catholics, Mormons, Democrats, Republicans, se­ cessionists, drunks, immigrants, and abolitionists-all were at one time or another on the receiving end ofBrownlow's merciless broadsides. Not surprisingly, he made many enemies. A number of them replied in kind; some tried to kill him. Parson Brownlow deserves a good biographer. He has had a few, but none better than E. Merton Coulter. First published in 1937 by the Uni­ versity of North Carolina Press, Coulter's William G. Brownlow: Fight­ ing Parson ofthe Southern Highlands was highly praised in its day and it remains the standard account of Brownlow's life. To help the modem generation of readers make the Parson's acquaintance, the University of Tennessee Press, which reprinted Coulter's book in 1971, has now done so again as part of its Appalachian Echoes series. l XII INTRODUCTION Coulter's volume has stood the test of time because its scholarship is sound and its prose lively. Coulter was a professionally trained and highly respected historian who earned his Ph.D. from the University ofWiscon­ sin in 1917, was a longtime teacher at the University of Georgia, became the first president of the Southern Historical Association, and was the author or editor of literally dozens of books. For this biography he thor­ oughly mined the relevant sources and drew on his vast knowledge of southern history to provide context. But he also knew how to tell a good story with a dash of humor, and that he also did in this book. He espe­ cially enjoyed quoting the highly quotable Parson, and Brownlow's in­ imitable rhetorical style comes through on practically every page.2 The book has thus aged well, but it has definitely aged. As today's readers enjoy Coulter's narrative, they need to keep in mind the flaws and weaknesses of the book (maybe "peculiarities and limitations" is a better way to put it) that have become apparent in the six decades since Coulter wrote it. For one thing, it is not really a comprehensive biography but rather a history of Brownlow's public career. Coulter has virtually nothing to say about the Parson's family life or other intimate relationships. This is due in part to the dearth of sources (Brownlow left very few revealing personal papers). But it can also undoubtedly be ascribed to a certain gentlemanly unwillingness on Coulter's part to pry into his subject's pri­ vate affairs. This was typical of biographers of Coulter's generation; a modern biographer would feel obliged at least to speculate about Brownlow's private life, based on whatever hints the existing records contain. We are all to some extent prisoners not only of our time but also of our place. Merton Coulter was no exception. He was a middle-class south­ ern white male who grew up in the New South era (he was born in North Carolina in 1890), and he had certain biases common among those like himself. In particular, he believed blacks were inherently inferior and undeserving of political equality, and he revered the Lost Cause (both his grandfathers had been Confederate soldiers). These beliefs and predilections shaped Coulter's portrayal of Par­ son Brownlow. The first third of the book, dealing with Brownlow's pre­ 1860 career, is a model of scholarly impartiality. Coulter's attitude to­ ward the Parson's fiercely partisan polemics is one of (somewhat amused) detachment-as long as Brownlow is flogging only the enemies of the Methodist Church, the Whig Party, temperance, and slavery. But when Brownlow takes his stand against secession and the Confederacy after 1860, and especially when he allies with the northern Radicals, disfran­ chises the former Confederates, and enfranchises the blacks during Re- INTRODUCTION XIII construction, Coulter turns hostile. Many regard Brownlow as something of a hero for his stalwart defense of the Union, even under threat ofdeath, but in Coulter's eyes, he and his fellow East Tennessee unionists were merely "obstinate" and "blindly patriotic" and in fact "guilty of treason" against the Confederacy. Many applaud Brownlow's enfranchisement of Tennessee's blacks-however impure his motives-as an act of justice, but for Coulter it was an unconscionable betrayal of the good white people of the state. The freed slaves "were letting their animal natures go unre­ strained," Coulter tells us, and "they became a menace to peace and prop­ erty." He justifies the lethal guerrilla warfare of the Ku Klux Klan as a necessary response to the "Black Peril" and the "abuses, debasements, and insults" that the former Confederates had to endure under Brownlow's rule. In Coulter's defense, it should be pointed out that his portrayal of Reconstruction was not unique. With very few exceptions, the other his­ torians of his generation-northern as well as southern-shared his ra­ cial prejudices and endorsed the view that Reconstruction was a "Tragic Era," a time when the worst elements of society ran rampant in the south­ ern states until the noble "Redeemers" overthrew the villainous Radical regimes and restored good government and racial controL During the 1960s, however, when the Civil Rights movement touched the conscience of the nation, younger historians began to challenge the reigning interpretation of Reconstruction. They pointed to the accom­ plishments of the Radical state governments in the South, including im­ proved public education, that the older historians had ignored or dismissed. Moreover, they ascribed a good measure of dignity and decency of pur­ pose to the blacks, scalawags, carpetbaggers, Freedmen's Bureau agents, and northern Radicals whom the older historians had demonized. Some of the young revisionists condemned the long-celebrated Redeemers as racist reactionaries and the Klansmen in particular as murderous political terrorists. Under heavy attack, the traditional interpretation soon crumbled. Today the idea of the Tragic Era is unanimously rejected as myth by schol­ ars, though it still has a hold on the popular imagination.3 His judgments on Brownlow's wartime unionism and postwar Radi­ calism aside, Coulter's portrayal of the Parson has held up remarkably well. Coulter basically disliked Brownlow, and so have most of the histo­ rians who have written about him since 1937--even those not in sympa­ thy with Coulter's views on blacks and the Confederacy. Most agree with Coulter that Brownlow's zealous partisanship often went beyond the bounds of fairness, propriety, and even reason. ("Fanatical" is Coulter's favorite description of the Parson, and it is echoed by many other writ­ ers.) And all join Coulter in condemning Governor Brownlow's Machia- XIV INTRODUCTION vellian manipulation of voter registration and election returns. But, at the same time, all second Coulter's point that Brownlow's private persona stood in stark contrast to his public persona (Coulter calls him "a Dr. Jekyl and a Mr. Hyde"): even many of the Parson's opponents admitted that, in private, he was friendly, kind, and generous to a fault.4 In fact, historical scholarship since 1937 has not altered the basic outline ofBrownlow's life as presented by Coulter-evidence ofCoulter's diligent research. Some new details have come to light, however; and a certain amount of reinterpretation, or at least recontextualization, of the Parson's career has been done, particularly since the 1960s. (For a dis­ cussion of the studies of Brownlow published between 1937 and 1970, see James W. Patton's introduction to the 1971 edition of Coulter's book.) Monographs published in recent years by Paul H. Bergeron and Jonathan M. Atkins have shed added light on Brownlow's role in antebel­ lum politics. The Parson's prewar religious and temperance activities have been elucidated in essays by Forrest Conklin and John W. Wittig. Re­ search by Durwood Dunn has turned up Brownlow's signature on an 1834 antislavery petition-a revelation that would have mightily embarrassed the Parson, who later became a prominent proslavery spokesman, and mightily amused Merton Coulter, who loved to point out Brownlow's inconsistencies. Another discovery by Dunn that would have made Brownlow blush and Coulter chuckle is a contemporary report (albeit secondhand) that in 1840, at a political rally, the Parson got roaring drunk.5 Modem scholarship dealing with Brownlow in the secession crisis includes a monograph by Daniel W. Crofts and an essay by Charles F. Bryan Jr. Both underscore the crucial role of Brownlow and a handful of other East Tennessee unionist leaders in encouraging a firm stand against secession by the citizens of the region. More recently, Noel C. Fisher has produced a study of East Tennessee's internal civil war that emphasizes the impact of the Parson's wartime writings and speeches on the northern public and military. Anew edition of Brownlow's 1862 book, which was a bestseller in the North, has been published with an introduction by the present author; and Noel Fisher has written an essay comparing that book with others by East Tennessee unionists.6 Brownlow's governorship is discussed (within the broader context of postwar Republicanism in southern Appalachia) in Gordon B. McKinney's recently reprinted monograph. McKinney contradicts Coulter's assertion that Brownlow's long-term impact on Tennessee poli­ tics was slight; and he makes the point, at least implicitly, that Brownlow played a role in shaping the popular perception of southern Appalachia as a unique, isolated region. Other modem studies of the Parson's guberna­ torial years include Wilson D. Miscamble's essay on the 1865 election, Lonnie E. Maness's on the 1867 election, and Kathleen R. Zebley's on INTRODUCTION xv Tennessee legislator Samuel Amell, one of Brownlow's Radical allies. Brownlow's stumping in the North during the 1866 congressional cam­ paigns is examined in an essay by Forrest Conklin.? In recent decades only two authors have ventured to write compre­ hensive accounts of Brownlow. Steve Humphrey's book focuses on the Parson as a newspaper editor, though it does touch on the other aspects of his life. (For one thing, Humphrey documents the fact that Brownlow owned slaves for a time, which Coulter was apparently unaware of.) Un­ like most other commentators on Brownlow, Humphrey (a journalist him­ self) actually seems to like the man, admiring especially his editorial prow­ ess, his humor, and his generosity. James C. Kelly's two-part essay on the Parson is not as complimentary nor as detailed, but Kelly is the only historian so far who has reevaluated Brownlow in the light of modem interpretations ofReconstruction. Though he condemns Brownlow's zeal­ otry and his misuse of power as governor, Kelly commends him for per­ ceiving the new political realities that made black enfranchisement desir­ able and for recognizing that reenfranchising the former Confederates would be disastrous for black rights.8 Historians will certainly continue to reappraise Brownlow, but it is unlikely that the basic story of his public career as told by Merton Coulter will ever be substantially revised. And, barring the discovery of some treasure-trove of hitherto unknown personal papers, any future explora­ tions of Brownlow's private life will be mere guesswork. Coulter's study of the "Fighting Parson" will thus have a place on the historian's shelf for a long time to come. Anybody else who enjoys a good book about a re­ markable character should save a place for it, too. Stephen V. Ash University of Tennessee, Knoxville Notes 1. E. Merton Coulter, William G. Brownlow: Fighting Parson of the Southern Highlands (Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1937; re­ print, Knoxville: Univ. ofTennessee Press, 1971). For evidence ofthe schol­ arly reception of the book, see the reviews by Frank L. Owsley in the Missis­ sippi Valley Historical Review 24 (1937-38): 403-5, Stanley 1. Folmsbee in the Journal ofSouthern History 3 (1937): 374-76, and Thomas Robson Hay in the American Historical Review 43 (1937-38): 419-20. 2. For biographical information on Ellis Merton Coulter (1890-1981), XVI INTRODUCTION see Twentieth Century Authors: A Biographical Dictionary ofModem Lit­ erature (1st supp!., New York: H. W. Wilson, 1955),234-35; Contemporary Authors: New Revision Series, Volume 3 (Detroit: Gale Research, 1981), 139; and ContemporaryAuthors, Volume 104 (Detroit: Gale Research, 1982), 94. Descriptions of Coulter's most important books can be found in Arthur S. Link and Rembert W. Patrick, eds., Writing Southern History: Essays in Historiography in Honor of Fletcher M. Green (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Dniv. Press, 1965); and John B. Boles and Evelyn Thomas Nolen, eds., Interpreting Southern History: Historiographical Essays in Honor of Sanford W Higginbotham (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Dniv. Press, 1987). See also Fred Arthur Bailey, "History in Service to the South: E. Merton Coulter and the Political Culture of Southern Historiography," paper pre­ sented at the Southern Historical Association Meeting, Binningham, Ala., Nov. 1998. 3. On the evolution of Reconstruction historiography, see Larry Kincaid, "Victims of Circumstance: An Interpretation of Changing Atti­ tudes Toward Republican Policy Makers and Reconstruction," Journal of American History 57 (1970): 48-66; Richard O. Curry, "The Civil War and Reconstruction, 1861-1877: A Critical Overview of Recent Trends and Interpretations," Civil War History 20 (1974): 215-38; John Hope Franklin, "Mirror for Americans: A Century of Reconstruction History," American Historical Review 85 (1) (1980): 1-14; Eric Foner, "Reconstruction Revisited," Reviews in American History 10 (1982): 82­ 100; and Joe Gray Taylor, "The White South from Secession to Redemp­ tion," in Boles and Nolen, Interpreting Southern History, 162-98. 4. In a 1981 poll ofTennessee historians, Brownlow was ranked dead last among the state's governors, scoring a 1.63 average on a 10-point scale. See Tennessee Historical Quarterly 41 (1982): 100. 5. Paul H. Bergeron, Antebellum Politics in Tennessee (Lexington: Dniv. Press of Kentucky, 1982); Jonathan M. Atkins, Parties, Politics, and the Sectional Conflict in Tennessee, 1832-1861 (Knoxville: Dniv. ofTennessee Press, 1997); Forrest Conklin and John W. Wittig, "Religious Warfare in the Southern Highlands: Brownlow versus Ross," Journal of East Tennessee History 63 (1991): 33-50; Forrest Conklin, "Parson Brownlow Joins the Sons of Temperance," Tennessee Historical Quarterly 39 (1980): 178-94, 292-309; Durwood Dunn, AnAbolitionist in the Appalachian South: Ezekiel Birdseye on Slavery, Capitalism, and Separate Statehood in East Tennessee, 1841-1846 (Knoxville: Dniv. ofTennessee Press, 1997), 14-16, 19-20,38, 97n., 104-5n., 145. Aside from Dunn's discoveries, little additional primary material bearing directly on Brownlow has turned up since Coulter did his research. A sizable batch of Brownlow's papers unknown to Coulter has been unearthed recently, but it includes very few items written by the Parson INTRODUCTION XVII himself; seeW. Todd Groce, "With'All the Malice and Venom Requisite for the Times': The Papers of Parson Brownlow," Univ. of Tennessee, Knox­ ville, Library DevelopmentReview (1992-93): 8-11. The editors ofAndrew Johnson's papers have published many Brownlow letters, very helpfully annotated, but few or none that Coulter had not seen in manuscript; see LeRoy P. Graf, Ralph W. Haskins, and Paul H. Bergeron, eds., The Papers ofAndrew Johnson (14 vols. to date, Knoxville: Univ. of Tennessee Press, 1967- ). 6. Daniel W. Crofts, Reluctant Confederates: Upper South Union­ ists in the Secession Crisis (Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1989); Charles F. Bryan Jr., "A Gathering of Tories: The East Tennessee Convention of 1861," Tennessee Historical Quarterly 39 (1980): 27-48; Noel C. Fisher, War at Every Door: Partisan Politics and Guerrilla Vio­ lence in East Tennessee, 1860-1869 (Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Caro­ lina Press, 1997); Stephen V. Ash, ed., Secessionists and Other Scoun­ drels: Selectionsfrom Parson Brownlow's Book (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press, 1999); Noel Fisher, "Definitions of Loyalty: Unionist Histories of the Civil War in East Tennessee," Journal ofEast Tennessee History 67 (1995): 58-88. See also Forrest Conklin, ed., '''Parson' Brownlow on the Impeachment of Judge Humphreys and Other Matters in Washington, D.C.-June, 1862," East Tennessee Historical Society's Publications 56/57 (1984/1985): 120-31. 7. Gordon B. McKinney, Southern Mountain Republicans, 1865­ 1900: Politics and the Appalachian Community (Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1978; reprint, Knoxville: Univ. ofTennessee Press, 1998); Wilson D. Miscamble, "Andrew Johnson and the Election ofWil­ Ham G. ('Parson') Brownlow as Governor ofTennessee," Tennessee His­ torical Quarterly 37 (1978): 308-20; Lonnie E. Maness, "Henry Emerson Etheridge and the Gubernatorial Election of 1867: A Study in Futility," West Tennessee Historical Society Papers 47 (1993): 37-49; Kathleen R. Zebley, "Unconditional Unionist: Samuel Mayes Amell and Recon­ struction in Tennessee," Tennessee Historical Quarterly 53 (1994): 246­ 59; Forrest Conklin, "Wiping Out 'Andy' Johnson's Moccasin Tracks: The Canvass of Northern States by Southern Radicals, 1866," Tennessee Historical Quarterly 52 (1993): 122-33. 8. Steve Humphrey, "That D-d Brownlow": Being a Saucy and Malicious Description ofWilliam Gannaway Brownlow . .. (Boone, N.C.: Appalachian Consortium Press, 1978); James C. Kelly, "William Gannaway Brownlow," Tennessee Historical Quarterly 43 (1984): 25­ 43, 155-72. See also Stephen F. Humphrey, "The Man Brownlow from a Newspaper Man's Point of View," East Tennessee Historical Society's Publications 43 (1971): 59-70. CHAPTER I CRUSADING IN THE SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS To ADMIT that one sprang from the second families of Virginia marks a strange trait. Indeed, it may well be argued that if the admission were publicly made and without provocation, it points to positive idiosyncrasies. So much undoubtedly can be proved on William Gannaway Brownlow, known to his time and to history as the Fighting Parson. Like Abraham Lincoln, his ancestry was the short and simple annals of the poor, but un­ like Lincoln he made a virtue out of telling it. Brownlow's father was Joseph A. Brownlow, who was born in Rockbridge County, Virginia in 1781. He spent his life drift­ ing down the great valleys of Southern Appalachia, and by 1816, when he died, he had reached East Tennessee. Brownlow's mother was Catherine Gannaway, also a Virginian. This couple had proceeded southwestward as far as a farm in Wythe County, when their first child was born. It was on the ~9th day of August, 1805, and the child was a boy. They named him William, to do honor to one of his father's brothers, and they added Gannaway out of respect for his mother's family. Two brothers and two sisters followed in rather close succession, to be his playmates. At the age of thirty-five his father died, a victim of the hard life of the frontiersman, and his mother, with feelings too tender for so dire a fate, grieved much for her departed husband, and followed him within less than three months. At the age of eleven Andrew Johnson, later to loom large on the Brownlow horizon, had lost only his father; Brownlow at the same age had lost both father and mother. Though an orphan he grew strong and by the time he became the Fighting Parson he seems to have dis­ covered how to transform vehemence into strength, for he out­ lived all of his brothers and sisters by almost two decades.! 1 For the early life and ancestry of Brownlow see, W. G. Brownlow, Sketches of the Rue, Progres8, and Decline of Secessionj with a Narrative of Personal ~ WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW Brownlow was born in that mountainous region below Mason and Dixon's Line, which might well be called Southern Appa­ lachia. It is one great physiographic unit, embracing more than 100,000 square miles, and extending southward 500 miles and more as far as northern Georgia and Alabama. Ignoring the mighty decrees of nature, man, with his adventitious political divisions, cut it up and parcelled it out among no less than eight states; but the natural coherence of the people of Southern Appalachia has stood out boldly in every great crisis which has confronted them. Nature built this region on a plan clear and simple. On the west is the bold Cumberland escarpment, and on the east is the Blue Ridge, which in North Carolina and Ten­ nessee goes under the name of the Unakas and the Great Smoky Mountains. Between lies the Great Appalachian Valley, which is in fact various valleys running northeast and southwest. This region, instead of being inaccessible, and hostile to man's es­ thetic tastes and his economic struggles, is kindly disposed to both. The beauty of the smoothly formed green ridges and the great towering peaks, and the fertility of the broad river valleys attracted people no less in the early pIoneer days than at present. Into these beautiful valleys came the Scotch-Irish before the Revolutionary War,2 and so eager were they and other early settlers to see and to seize what was further on that, without knowing it, they passed on out of the Old Dominion and as early as 1769 reached the Watauga and Holston valleys in the King's Adventures among the Rebels, pp. 15-17 (This book is best known under the binder's title, Parson B1'ownlow's Book and is thus referred to hereafter); Portrait and Biography of Parson Brownlow, the Tennessee Patriot, Together with his Last Ed'itorial in the Knoreville Whig; also, his recent Speeches, Rehears­ ing his Ereperience with Secession, and his Prison Life, p. 27, (referred to here­ after as Portrait and Biography); W. G. Brownlow, Helps to the Study of Pres­ byterianism or, an Unsophisticated Ereposition of Calvinism, with Hopkineian Modifications and Policy, with a View to a more easy Interpretation of the Same. To Which is Added a Brief Account of the Life and Travels of the Au­ thor, Interspersed 'With Anecdotes, pp. 242-43 (referred to hereafter as Helps to the Study of Presbyterianism. The personal narrative part of this book has been republished in S. G. Heiskell, Andrew Jackson and Early Tennessee His­ tory, III, 227-72); R. N. Price, Holston Methodism, III, 815-18; Oliver P. Temple, Notable Men of Tennessee from 1893 to 1875, p. 818; and American Annual Cyclopaedia, 1877, p. 79. 1I Many Germans drifted into the Shenandoah Valley. CRUSADING IN THE SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS 8 colony of North Carolina. With characteristic frontier initia­ tive they set up a government of their own, writing out on American soil for the first time a fundamental charter, and call­ ing it the Watauga Association. They fought the King at the battle of Kings Mountain and later when affairs in state and nation were not going to suit them, they showed further initia­ tive and daring by declaring themselves the independent State of Franklin. The spell of the frontier led people of every estate in life to drift westward, and as they trudged along, the Great South­ ern Highlands laid first claim on them and levied its toll. In its strategic position it stood to win some of the best as well as the worst. It had fertile valleys which satisfied the most fastidious, and it possessed barriers, which stopped the weaklings and shift­ less and afforded them homes which no other would accept. So it was that some seeing the fertile lands, stopped through choice; others suffering the breakdown of a wagon wheel, remained by accident; and still others too poor and too weak to proceed farther, settled down through hard necessity. In Southern Appalachia were developing such families as the Breckinridges, the Prestons, and the Clays who were to move out about the beginning of the nineteenth century and attach their names indelibly to other parts of the country. On the edges of this region were born the J effersons and the Cal­ houns. Originating on the outside Andrew Jackson entered it, remained for a time, and then moved on; Andrew Johnson came to stay; David Crockett and Sam Houston were born in the heart of Southern Appalachia, and both moved westward to cast their lots with Texas. Admiral David G. Farragut came from this region, and it was not by accident that he supported the Union in the Civil War. And in the latter part of the century Bob Taylor, born in East Tennessee, fiddled himself into the hearts of his fellow-citizens and into the office of governor of the state. Later his brother Alf won the same office, though through the power of the opposite party, the Republicans. And downward into the twentieth century Southern Appalachia has not ceased to attract attention. It remained for a little town in 4 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW East Tennessee to draw upon itself the eyes of the world as it sought to prove that a great Englishman was wrong if not sac­ rilegious when he formulated his theory of evolution. In such a region Brownlow found himself at the age of eleven, an orphan. He was not of the rich valley people who tilled farms of plantation proportions, though both the Brownlows and the Gannaways had been sufficiently well-to-do to own a few slaves. It is also evident that there was at that time a class of people in the out-of-the-way places who had an economic standing lower than the Brownlows. Manifestly a boy of eleven could do little toward feeding and clothing a family of four younger brothers and sisters, so these five orphans were scattered among their relatives. Billy Brownlow was sent to his Uncle John Gannaway, and for the next seven years he worked on a farm and earned his keep by the sweat of his brow. As the hard life of a farmer did not appeal to him, at the age of eighteen he got his uncle's permission to leave, and went to Abingdon, in Wash­ ington County. Here he apprenticed himself to another uncle, George Winniford, a house-carpenter and a planter, and for three years worked at the business of sawing planks, and build­ ing them into houses. But he was soon convinced that he was not destined to go through life doing such things, and so decided to get an education and become a man of some importance. In 18~5 a camp-meeting was reported in progress at Sul­ phur Springs, twenty-five miles from Abingdon. Brownlow went over to join the crowd, and soon found himself converted, and then for the first time in his life was "enabled to shout aloud the wonders of redeeming love." As he recalled the occasion a few years later, "All my anxieties were then at an end-all my hopes were realized--my happiness was complete."3 A sudden change had now come over him. He quit being a carpenter, and hurried away from Abingdon back up into Wythe County, there to have his rude educational tools welded by William Horne into finer in­ struments. This year ended his formal schooling, but it height­ ened his insatiable desire to read and study almost every book he could lay his hands on. a Brownlow, Helps to the Study of Presbyterianism, pp. 248-44; Kno(l;ville Whig, September 9, 1868. 6 WILLIAM: G. BROWNLOW As Brownlow read, he also observed. He was soon convinced that the quickest way to become a great man in his little world in Southern Appalachia was to join in the great religious boom then in progress. Not much education was needed, but a large amount of religious fervor, excitability, and pugnacity would go a long way, and if a ready tongue and a quick wit were added, the combination would be complete. As Brownlow had all these qualities in excellent proportions, he decided to join in the move­ ment. According to the law of probabilities, he should have be­ come a volunteer in the Presbyterian forces, for these crusaders were the first to visit the back country of Virginia, in the Scotch­ Irish migrations of colonial times. The Brownlow family was Scotch-Irish and naturally was Presbyterian, but the Ganna­ ways were Methodists and it was they who had the last word on religious matters with Billy Brownlow before he became a man. And then, too, the Methodist ways of doing things suited Brownlow much better. Finally, it was a Methodist meeting which had turned him to the Lord. So Brownlow decided to join the l\1:ethodist movement and become a leader in the front ranks. As the Holston Conference was scheduled to meet in Abingdon in the fall of 1826, he planned to attend and to apply for ad­ mission into the travelling ministry. Bishop Joshua Soule pre­ sided this year, and it was he who admitted Brownlow, assigning him to the Black Mountain Circuit, in North Carolina, an out­ post on the eastern slopes of Appalachia. What sort of task confronted this new parson in the wilder­ ness? What had the forces of organized religion done for South­ ern Appalachia and what had been their manner of doing it? These questions must of need be settled. It brings no profit to anyone to be able to say truly which might have been the first denomination to be represented in any given portion of the great Southern Highl,ands by some wandering preacher, per­ haps, self-appointed; but it is of much importance as far as history goes to be able to say which denomination first came in considerable force and tended to hold the upper hand. This strategic position fell to the Presbyterians, as before intimated, but they were soon being hard-pressed by the l\1:ethodists and CRUSADING IN THE .SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS 7 Baptists. The Presbyterians were in Abingdon some years be­ fore the American Revolution broke out, for Charles Cummings went there in 177~ to serve two congregations already organized. On down into East Tennessee they drifted; when Francis As­ bury passed through that region in 180~ he found them well organized. The Presbyterians were the religious aristocrats in this frontier country. They believed in education and carried out that belief by setting up academies and colleges. In 1783 Samuel Doak set up l\:Iartin's Academy at Salem. A dozen years later this was transformed into Washington College. Greene­ ville College was provided for in 1794, and the year 1819 saw the beginnings of Southern and Western Theological Semi­ nary, which later became Maryville College.4 A few stray religious enthusiasts who called themselves Bap­ tists seem to have made their appearance in East Tennessee, long before this name was applied to the region, even as early as the Watauga settlement. The Indians demolished one of their establishments before the Revolutionary War, but the Baptists were back again by 1781, this time at Buffalo Ridge. Thereafter one Baptist association followed another in a steady progression, bearing such names as Holston, Nolichucky, Powell's Valley, Sweetwater, Sequatchee, and Ocoee.5 Methodist men of God were in the back country almost as soon as a settlement would spring up; their activities began in South­ west Virginia before 1783, for it was in this year that the Hol­ ston Circuit was set up. The first Conference ever to be held west of the mountains took place in East Tennessee in l\1ay, 1788, at a place called Half-Acres; and it was the ubiquitous Asbury who presided. Later he passed through this region often in his wilderness travels, and now and then Lorenzo Dow, "the crazy "J. E. Alexander, A Brief History of the Synod of Tenne.~.~ee from 1817 to 1887, pp. 5,11,64-81; C. B. Coale, The Life and Adventures of William Waters, the FamO'US Hunter and Trapper of lVhite Top Mountain, embracing Early History of Southwestern Virginia, Sufferings of the Pioneers, etc. etc. pp. 246­ 58; W. T. Hale and D. L. Merritt, A History of Tennessee and Tennesseeans, p. 223; Journal of Rev. Francis Asbury, III, 87; L. S. Merriam, Higher Education in Tennessee, p. 63. II David Benedict, .A General History of the Baptist Denomination in America and other Parts of the World. 8 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW preacher," came this way. Soon the Methodists were setting up their circuits throughout all Southern Appalachia. As for schools and colleges, the followers of John 'Vesley were not quite sure that such man-made institutions might not afford easy ways for wasting money. And at this time the feeling was not completely dispelled from among them that a Methodist preach­ er :Reeded no more education than that with which the Lord had endowed him. Yet in 1831 they founded Holston Seminary at New l\{arket, in East Tennessee, and falling into the habits of the times, they soon changed it into a manual training school. In 1836 the Holston Conference succeeded in founding a college which they had been contemplating for four years. At first they decided to locate it at Strawberry Plains, in East Tennessee, but their final decision was to go to Washington County, in South­ west Virginia. This institution developed into Emory and Henry College.6 Carrying religion to the frontier was beset with almost as many dangers and inconveniences as dogged the steps of the Crusaders in the Holy Land. The Methodist circuit-rider was in the forefront; the Baptist itinerant was not far behind; the Presbyterians, ~hi1e generally early on the field, enjoyed more security back of the lines. The frontier preacher, though little educated, was tremendously serious; indeed, his zeal often went in inverse proportion to his learning. Hunting souls was to some adventuresome frontiersmen much the same as hunting bears might be to others. There was much the same sort of sport for both, although the soul hunter might not always recognize it. Each made a living, and neither grew wealthy. The Methodist circuit-rider was allowed about $80 a year if he could find means for getting it, and in computing this amount, gifts of food and raiment and fees for marrying couples were included. lIe was urged to remain single as long as he was on the circuit, and if he felt he must marry he was urged to "locate," in order to sup­ plement his income from other means than preaching. Old Peter 6 J. B. McFerrin, History of 'j{ethodi,'1m in Tennessee; W. W. Sweet, The Rise of Methodism in the West, p. 15; Journal of Francis Asbury, II, 33; Coale, op. cit., pp. 205-8, 246-58; Brownlow, Helps to the Study of Presbyterianism, pp. 284-85. CRUSADING IN THE SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS 9 Cartwright, who knew well the business of circuit-riding, ob­ served, "But the Lord provided; and, strange as it may appear to the present generation, we got along without starving, or going naked."7 The circuit-rider's equipment generally consisted of a horse, a bridle, a saddle, and saddle-bags. Among the contents of his saddle-bags were a Bible, and perhaps occasionally a copy of Milton's works. The latter was valuable for descriptions of hell­ fire; the former must be a constant companion, for the Bible should be continuously studied in order that the sinner might be the more easily refuted. And furthermore a frontier preacher would be forever disgraced among his fellows if he were ever caught off guard to the extent that he could not preach a sermon at the shortest notice on any given passage in the Bible. Ezek. 1 :16 reads, "The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel." This difficult passage led a Presbyterian preacher to construct a sermon which he called "A Wheel With­ in a Wheel," and which he liked so well that he had it printed in the Calvanistic Magazine, an East Tennessee publication.s Once a Methodist bishop exhibited his learning by beginning his sermon in this wise, "My beloved hearers, I shall in the first place speak to you of the things which you know; second, of what I know, and you do not know; third, of the things that neither of us know.,,9 The frontier man of God was a hard rider, a hard preacher, and a hard liver. One who knew the Methodist itineracy in its greatest vigor declared that it had no ruffles or lawn sleeves that it cared to soil, no love-locks that it feared to disorder, no buckles it was loath to tarnish. It lodged roughly, and it fared scantily. It tramped up muddy ridges, ., w. P. Strickland, ed., Autobiography of Peter Oartwright, the Back'tl1ood, Preacher, pp. 521-22; William Henry Milburn, Ten Years of Preacher Life; Ohapters from an Autobiography, pp. S47-88. S Vol. III, No.7 (July, 1829), pp. 199-213. This magazine was started in Jan­ uary, 1827, in Rogersville, in East Tennessee, by James Gallaher, Frederick A. Ross, and David Nelson. See also Milburn, op. cit., pp. 365-66. • Ibid., p. 868. 10 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW it swam or forded rivers to the waist; it slept on leaves or raw deer-skin, and pillowed its head on saddle-bags; it bivouacked among wolves or Indians; now it suffered from ticks or mosquitoes -it was attacked by dogs, it was hooted, and it was pelted-but it throve. tO He threaded his way through the wilderness with a Bible in one hand and a sword in the other. He might have had im­ perfect notions of the universe outside of Southern Appalachia, but he was, seriously going about the task which he knew it was his duty to perform. His language was fiery and direct, for he knew he had a great issue to settle every time he preached. He had the conviction that there were souls in his audience which if not saved then would go down to eternal damnation before he should return. An East Tennessee religious publication excited­ ly declared, "With unspeakable distress we have heard of the alarming prevalence and wide-spread ravages of moral death in one of the western counties of Virginia." A runner had but recently arrived and told "with streaming eyes of the ruin which appears to hang over the people."!t The earliest preachers of course found no meeting-houses, so they preached under some large tree or on the doorstep of some willing convert. Bishop Asbury came through East Tennessee in the fall of 180~ and reported that he "had sacrament and love feast in the woods."!2 The lack of meeting-houses and the strange religious outburst that swept over the whole western frontier at the break of the nineteenth century, led to the camp-meetings which were held out in the midst of the forest. The Great Revival seems to have had its earliest and most intense manifestations beyond the mountains out in Kentucky, but some of the strang­ est outbursts first appeared in East Tennessee. People for miles around went to these meetings in almost unbelievable numbers for where else could they go and what else was there to draw them together, unless it were the tricks of a politician? Bishop Asbury attended a camp-meeting in 180~ near Jonesboro. It 10 Wm. W. Wightman, Life of William Caper.." D.D., one of the Bishops of the Methodist Episcopal Church South; including an Autobiography, pp. 471-72. 11 Calvini..,tic Magazine, vol. I, no. 1 (January, 1827), p. 29. 12 Journal of Francis Asbury, III, 87. CRUSADING IN THE SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS 11 lasted for four days and drew a modest crowd of about 1,500 people. According to his account, "We had a shaking, and some souls felt convicting and converting grace."13 But it remained for "crazy Dow," who debouched from Buncombe County, in North Carolina, down the French Broad River, the next year, to discover and report on happenings strange even to the early frontier preacher. He had heard "about a singularity called the jerks or jerking exercise, which appeared first near Knoxville in August last, to the great alarm of the people...." At first he considered the report "vague and false," but "at length, like the Queen of Sheba" he set out to see for himself. He was soon in the midst of things and saw remarkable sights. The afflicted threw their heads to and fro hurriedly, at the same time jerking furiously in every limb. At one of the camp-meetings, he saw jerking-saplings, "where the people had laid hold of them and jerked so powerfully that they had kicked up the earth as a horse stamping Hies." Peter Cartwright knew much about jerk­ ing. He had had as many as five hundred people at one time jerking in his congregations. According to him the bonnets, hats, and combs of the women would Hy off, and so violently did their heads snap back and forth that "their long hair cracked almost as loudly as a wagoner's whip." The Lord smote the people of this wilderness in other strange fashions. People ran hurriedly to and fro on the camp grounds and in the tabernacle under the trees; some lay prostrate in beds of straw; others with Hays hurried out into the forests and whipped the trees as if they were chasing and chastising the devil; some went through the motions of playing the fiddle or sewing; and some went into the holy dance. Dow visited a camp-meeting across the line in Virginia where he heard a great pandemonium of the wicked break out, as they were smitten by the Lord. One preacher had used up his strength in exhorting the multitude and then an­ other "began to exhort, when there commenced a trembling among the wicked; one, a second, and a third fell from their seats and the cry for mercy became general ... and for eleven hours there was no cessation of the loud cries." The Quakers in 18 Ibid., p. 86. 12 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW East Tennessee did not seem to engage in these antics, but Dow found a sect of them "who do not feel free to wear colored clothes."14 These holy demonstrations gradually began to degenerate, in the eyes of some of the preachers, into gigantic frolics and horse-play performances, and the whole system of camp-meet­ ings soon came in for condemnation. Lorenzo Dow declared that he had heard a preacher produce "ten passages of Scrip­ ture to prove that dancing was once a religious exercise, but corrupted at Aaron's calf, and from thence young people got it for amusement." But the camp-meeting was destined to out­ last all its critics, even into the dawn of the twentieth century. It became one of the fixed institutions in Southern Appalachia, serving not only the religious group but also the irreligious ele­ ment. The announcement of a camp-meeting brought glee to the hearts of all the bullies, drunkards, pickpockets, horse­ traders, horse-thieves, and whiskey-traffickers throughout all the surrounding country. To preserve order was no easy task, but in the performance of this function, some of the best preach­ ers developed into some of the most proficient fighters. Virile old Peter Cartwright, in his western vineyard, stood equally ready to instill the fear of God into his hearers through a sermon or by wielding a club. Once with a club he knocked a rowdy off' his horse, seized him, took him before a justice of the peace and had him fined $50. On another occasion he seized the whiskey supply of a bunch of disturbers and drove them off' the camp­ ground with a barrage of stones. When in the midst of his ser­ mon a woman disturbed the meeting by kicking her converted daughters, he tripped her up and threw her sprawling among the congregation, continuing his discourse as if nothing had happened. Now and then he worked such strategems on the hood- U T. W. Humes, The Loyal Mountaineers of Tenneuee, pp. 839-41; Perambula­ tions of Oosmopolite; or Travels and Labors of Lorenzo Dow in Europe and America, pp. 132-33; The Dealings of God, Man, and the Devil; as Eir:emplijied in the Life, Expe1'ience, and Travels of Lorenzo Dow, in a Period of over Half a Oentury; together with his Polemic and MiscellaneOUJl Writings. Oomplete. To 'which is added the Vicissitudes of Life, by Peggy Dow, Y, 27, 85 (referred to hereafter as Dealings of God, Man, and the Devil). Abel Stevens, History of the Methodist Episcopal Ohurch of the United States of America, IV, 4S.~. CRUSADING IN THE SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS 18 lums as playing on the vanity of their leader by appointing him peace officer and thereby turning him against his own gang, and by centering his heavenly artillery on the gang leader and sub­ duing him. Parson Cartwright's creed was "to love everybody, but to fear no one," and he added, "I did not permit myself to believe any man could whip me till it was tried." A gentle Bap­ tist itinerant in the Big Sandy Valley of Eastern Kentucky, by the use of his fiddle, tamed the spirit of the rowdies that might otherwise have disturbed him. lIS To say that these fiery champions of the Lord should fight only gangsters would leave unnoticed some of their greatest battles. In this great arena of Southern Appalachia there were three bands of gladiators-the Methodists, the Baptists, and the Presbyterians-contesting for the souls of the people. Fights waxed as hot among these three groups as ever th~y did between preacher and rowdy. The general tendency was for the two Cal­ vinistic groups, the Baptists and the Presbyterians, to join the fray against the Methodists. This union of forces was en­ couraged by the fact that the Methodists appeared to each of the other denominations to be the most dangerous rival. Meth­ odism was a frontier religion, made so by the chief characteris­ tics of its doctrines and by the nature of the frontiersmen. Among the cardinal principles of Methodism were free will, free grace, and individual responsibility. These ideas worked in definite harmony with frontier democracy. Such Calvinistic doctrines as predestination and foreordination could have little appeal to a headstrong son of the frontier, who wanted and would have his own way, in this world if not hereafter. So, con­ tentions and disputes grew up in which there was none too lowly to participate and none too high. At the very time Brownlow hecame a parson, a war against l\fethodism was raging, with Nathan Bangs and John Emory boldly fighting the battles for ,John Wesley. Although one of the most historic fights against Methodists in Southern Appalachia was carried on by a Pres­ byterian, the Baptists developed the more intense rivalry with the 11 Milburn, op. cit., pp. 383-84; W. R. Jillson, The Big Sand!1 ValleJI. A Regional llistory Prior to the Year 1850, pp. 105-6; Strickland, op. cit., p. 138. 14 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW Methodists and engaged in the greater number of battles. Jacob Young, a Methodist preacher, experienced much trouble in organizing a circuit until he was able to dispel the feeling of the people that he was a Baptist. On one occasion, as darkness was fast approaching, he spied a cabin in the midst of the forest. He approached and asked the woman in the door­ way whether he might spend the night. She was on the point of turning him away as a roving Baptist, when he explained that he was a Methodist. Thereupon she exclaimed, "La me! has a Methodist preacher come at last? Yes, brother, you shall stay all night."16 The point of difference between the Methodists and Baptists that produced the greatest amount of disputing was the question of baptism. So many revivals had been held in the Clinch Circuit and the people had been preached to so much that they had become "very superstitious in their notions-look­ ing for miracles and things out of the common order. They ex­ pected for God to tell them everything that they ought to do." According to the Reverend Mr. Young, A class-leader became dissatisfied with the baptism he received when he was an infant, and began to think he ought to be baptized by immersion; he talked to the preachers and to the brethren, but concluded he would lay it before the Lord. One morning he arose early and went upon the mountain, and continued in prayer until late in the afternoon. But before sundown, the family heard him crying at the top of his voice, and he came down from the mountain, in full speed, crying, "Baptism, baptism, baptism, by immersion!" He thought he had received the revelation right from heaven; others thought so too, and away they went and were immersed-then they felt that all was well.17 Often Methodist and Baptist ministers interrupted each other in their meetings and now and then meetings were broken up by the indignant enemy. On one occasion a Baptist cried out in a Methodist service, "Sir, you have preached lies this day, 18 Autobiography of a Pioneer: or, the Nativity, Experience, Travels, and :lI-linisterial Labors of Rev. Jacob Young with Incidents, Observations, and Re­ flections, p. 83. 11 Ibid., pp. 126-27. CRUSADING IN THE SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS 15 and 1 can prove it from the word of God."ls The congregation dispersed in riotous disorder. But the Methodists were not above taking the offensive. A Baptist, after bitterly castigating a Methodist, called upon anyone in his audience to deny the truth of his charges. Peter Cartwright arose and assailed him so mer­ cilessly that he fled from the house. Then, according to Cart­ wright's account, "I ordered him to stop, and told him, if he did not, 1 would shoot him in the back for a tory; he got out at the door. He was taken so at surprise, and charged on so sud­ denly, that he forgot his hat, and he peepEd around the door­ chink at me. 1 blazed away at him till he dodged back, and started off, bare-headed, for home, talking to himself by the way."19 Parson Cartwright was greatly annoyed by the prose­ lyting Baptists who came across his trail, and he solemnly laid this charge against them: It was the order of the day (though I am sorry to say it), that we were constantly followed by a certain set of proselyting Bap­ tist preachers. These new and wicked settlements [in the upper Cumberland River region] were seldom visited by these Baptist preachers until the Methodist preachers entered them; then, when a revival was gotten up, or the work of God revived, these Baptist preachers came rushing in and they generally sung their sermons; and when they struck the long roll, or their sing-song mode of preaching, in substance it was "water! water! You must follow your blessed Lord down into the water!" ... indeed, they made so much ado about baptism by immersion, that the uninformed would suppose that heaven was an island, and there was no way to get there but by diving or swimming.20 The Presbyterians, less given to roving up and down the wilderness, carried on their warfare in the more dignified printed page. So they were answered likewise. Cartwright, equally ver­ satile as a pamphleteer or a verbal antagonist, hurled against them such compositions as these, "A Useful Discovery: or I 18 Ibid., p. 80. 19 Strickland, op. cit'J p. 136. This incident took place in the Cumberland River region in 1813. ... Ibid.J pp. 133-34. 16 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW Never Sa.w the Like Before," "The Dagon of Calvinism," and "The History of the Devil," and "Crazy Dow" entered the pamphleteer's arena against them with his "Chain."21 The ministers of Southern Appalachia had all the frailties of the rough frontiersmen among whom they worked. They suffered all the hardships that befell frontiersmen, but they bore them with joy for in their unshaken faith they knew they were performing the task the Lord had set for them. Had they not been combative in disposition they would never have secured a hearing or a following. People went to their meetings to be entertained, and many came 'away converted. When civilizing influences had softened the hard forces of nature and had tamed the savage disposition of man, the preachers, no longer having rivers to swim and rowdies to whip, intensified the warfare among themselves. Mankind is endowed with an irreducible min­ imum of piety which always promotes true religion, but churches have never depended on this fact alone.22 As time went on, edu­ cation and social standing were beginning to develop into re­ ligious assets, but stirring up prejudice and antagonism against the other sects was long to be a powerful weapon wielded by the preacher-warriors in Southern Appalachia. llI. W. S. Hooper, ed., Fifly Years as a Presiding Elder by Rev. Peter Cart­ wright, pp. 92 fT. llII Controversy was nothing new in the development and spread of religious sects. It has played so consistent a part in history that it might well be considered the normal. Methodism was ushered into America in the midst of a dispute be­ tween George Whitefield and John Wesley. New England was being torn asunder by her bitter religious contentions, while Southern Appalachia was yet the peace­ ful home of the Cherokees. CHAPTER II A NEW PARSON RIDES THE CIRCUIT BISHOP JOSHUA SOULE sent young Brownlow to one of the roughest and most inaccessible parts of all Southern Appala­ chia. The Holston Conference, in which Brownlow was to carry on his circuit-riding for the next ten years, was laid out with no regard at all for state lines; it embraced parts of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Tennessee, and the Parson on horseback carried his message into everyone of these states before he was finally allowed to locate. The Confer­ ence was composed of five districts, Abingdon, French Broad, Knoxville, Hiwassee and Asheville, and the districts were made up of varying numbers of circuits. In that part of the Confer­ ence where the long ridges prevailed, the circuit was more likely than not to be made up of a single valley, as the Clinch Circuit, which at one time was simply the Powell River Valley, 150 miles long and ~5 miles wide. But the Black Mountain Circuit, in the Asheville District, where Brownlow was sent, lay far over in North Carolina on the eastern slopes of the Blue Ridge where the mountains were jumbled and piled so high that they formed the roof of eastern North America. According to the custom, he was taken on trial, and indeed if he should succeed in cultivating the Lord's vineyard in such a region as this, he should soon well deserve the full connection that each circuit-rider expected after two years. Into this region in the fall of 18~6 came the twenty-one-year-old Parson, stretch­ ing upwards to the extent of about six feet, with sharp features, glaring eyes, and a determination written in his countenance that might mean defiance, fright, or fanaticism. If Joshua Soule had hoped to scare him out of the Methodist ministry by starting him off in such a place as the Black Mountain Circuit, the Bishop was much mistaken. The look in his face that some might have 18 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW interpreted as fright was in fact the quintessence of defiance and fanaticism. He seems never to have developed fear of anything throughout his long life. Yet there was hidden in his being a romantic love for nature in her most heroic moods. Instead of running from these rough mountains and swift torrents, he thought they were exquisitely beautiful. He signalized the day following his first Christmas as a circuit-rider by nearly freezing to death on Cane River. As for his vineyard, "There are few places in the world which can vie with the counties of Buncombe and Burke, in beauty and novelty of scenery-the extended hill-side fields, rich ridges, beautiful springs, mountain coves, high conical peaks, and astonishing verdure covering the soil, set off to the best advantage, the lofty Black Mountain." He was also greatly attracted by Table Rock, a great jumping-off place into the Piedmont region, which extended through Burke County to the eastward. l If there was romanticism in the Parson which his countenance did not show, there was a vast amount of fanatical zeal that showed in every lineament. The Baptists soon brought this characteristic into play. He had never come into contact with this sect before entering the Black Mountain region, but here he soon ran afoul of them, for they resented his activities and opposed him with much bitterness. He found them exceedingly bigoted and narrow and possessed of the certain feeling that they were the only ones who held a claim on "the bounty of the skies." He ran into one of their meetings where they were en­ gaged in the religious observance of foot-washing and he ob­ served, "never did I, before or since, see as many big dirty feet, washed in one large pewter basin full of water !"2 The next year he was moved back toward Tennessee to the French Broad Circuit, still in the Asheville District, but before the year was out he was sent to the Maryville Circuit in East Tennessee for three months, and then transferred again back into Buncombe County. While out in the Maryville region he had his first skirmish with the Presbyterians, who were very 1 Brownlow, Help, to the 8tudy of Pre,bytenanum, p. 245; Autobiography of a Pioneer, pp. 106-27. I Brownlow, B"p, to the 8tud, of Pr6loyterianilm, p. 244. A NEW PARSON RIDES THE cmCUIT 19 strong in that vicinity. He complained of being continuously pursued by a little Calvinistic upstart who made no end of pes­ tering him about such subjects as moral inability and the im­ possibility of falling from grace. He attended a meeting, where a Presbyterian was trying to describe the comical dress of a Methodist preacher. With a great bluster Brownlow stood up and asked the audience to look for themselves. This unexpected move threw the meeting into an uproar. By such acts Brownlow was becoming known and getting talked about far and wide. While in Knoxville one day he ran up on a Presbyterian min­ ister enjoying much fun in a movement he had launched to raise money for having Brownlow's picture painted. This promoter asked Brownlow for a subscription, whereupon the Parson quickly replied that he would contribute if it were set up "as a pattern for minister-making." By this time Brownlow had dis­ covered that his ugliness, which he never denied, served only to spread his name and reputation farther. This year he also had his brushes with the Baptists again, and when he heard them ridiculing and reviling the Methodists he rose up in their meet­ ings and denounced and confused them. He declared the Bap­ tist ministers were very quarrelsome even among themselves, that they often fought over a division of the money in the collec­ tion plate. Amidst all his contentions with the Calvinists, he found time to admire the beauty of nature and to try his powers of description upon it. How beautiful it was in the summer! "But 0, the huge, enormous mountains! the steep and dizzy precipices; the pend­ ant horrors of the craggy promontories-how wild and awful they look of a rainy evening !"3 At length another year rolled by and Brownlow prepared to attend the Annual Conference, which met this year at J ones­ boro, across the line in East Tennessee; and Bishop Joshua Soule was to preside again. In his mind he revolved this leave­ taking of his beloved mountains, "Adieu to those scenes, till the last loud trump of God shall sound; and until eruptions, earth­ quakes, comets, and lightnings, disgorge their blazing maga- lJ Ibid., pp. 246-48. flO WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW zines!" Soule seems to have approved of his underling's contest with the Presbyterians and the Baptists, for the Parson noted with much pleasure that the Bishop in a sermon at the Confer­ ence "certainly tore the very hindsite off of Calvinism!" This year the Parson was sent on his way into southeast Tennessee to the Washington Circuit in the Washington District. In this region he let his zeal for disputing run riot to such an extent that he soon found himself in the midst of a slander suit, which he, however, succeeded in getting dismissed. Here he also made another discovery. For the first time he now ran into a sect called the Cumberland Presbyterians, a group who had broken away from the regular Presbyterian Church out in Kentucky in 1810 because they believed the latter required too much education for those seeking to enter the ministry.4 He found their chief activities to be proselyting from the other churches and preach­ ing long sermons. He declared, "I do not recollect to have ever heard more than one who closed till he was completely out of strength, words, and ideas!" He also observed that he did not believe in long sermons and that no sermon should be longer than an hour, for "of all the deaths that ever any people died, there is none so distressing as that of being preached to death !'''~ This observation he soon forgot. The Parson seems to have had a great deal of curiosity in his make-up. Down in southeastern Tennessee he was in the former home of the Cherokee Indians, and not far removed from their abode at that time. He decided to make them a visit to see how they looked, how they lived, and what their religion was like. At this time Georgia was having trouble with her unwelcome red­ men, so Brownlow decided to carry out his visiting in Alabama. Since he had an uncle living near Muscle Shoals, on the Ten­ nessee River, he first went there and then traveled through the Cherokee nation. He found those Indians who were not savages to be good Methodists, and he heard an excellent prayer deliv­ ered by Turtlefields, one of their preachers.6 40 For an account of the rise of this sect see Lewis and R. H. Collins, History of Kentucky, I, 438--36. II Brownlow, Helps to the Study of Presbyterianism, pp. 249-51. II Ibid., pp. 251-52. A NEW PARSON RIDES THE CIRCUIT fll In 18fl9 the Holston Conference met in Abingdon, Virginia. Though he remained in the same district as formerly, Brown­ low was transferred to the Athens Circuit. While on this circuit, the Parson succeeded so well in his work that his enemies named a dog for him. He also got himself involved in a newspaper controversy.7 Brownlow as a crusader seemed to suit the Methodists, for in 18fl9 he was admitted into full connection, and the next year he was given elder's orders. This year the Annual Conference met at Ebenezer in Greene County, Tennessee, attended by the two bishops, William M'Kendree and Joshua Soule. The latter presided, and sent Brownlow this year to the Tellico Circuit in the Hiwassee region of Tennessee. Here the Parson ran into an eddy of that disturbance which was sweeping over the coun­ try under the name of Anti-Masonic movement. He heard a great deal of talk about Masonry, but since he was not quite able to gain from the outside a knowledge of just what it was, he decided to exercise a bit of self-restraint and not preach a sermon against it. But here and elsewhere he was to run into a species of quacks, which he felt quite sure he did understand, and he thundered out against them with all his vehemence. They were the so-called steam doctors, who carried around a concoc­ tion which they gave for all ailments.s The Parson traveled over Southern Appalachia more or less according to the laws of a cyclone. He had a daily motion inside the circuit and a great circular forward movement, on which he advanced each year by the aid of Bishop Soule. He began in the eastern confines of the Holston Conference in North Carolina and receded westward down the French Broad River into East Tennessee and then southwest into the south­ east corner of Tennessee, only to be pushed back eastward toward the place of his beginning. At the 1831 Conference he was sent to the Franklin Circuit, which lay around about the three-state corner, where North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia touched one another. This year he made three tours through the southeastern ramparts of the Southern Highlands, 7 Ibid., pp. 252-5-1. 8 Ibid., pp. 256, 281-82. 22 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW the "Taxaway Mountains" as he chose to denominate them, and he later marvelled that he did not lose his life. He found this region infested with Baptists and he adjudged them as pestiferous as ever. They were always shouting "water! ... as if the Saviour of mankind were a pennywinkle, and could only be found hanging to a sand-stone, in the bottom of some water course!" One of them, named Humphrey Posey, he en­ dured as long as he could, and he finally took the offensive and accused Posey of selling Bibles which he was being paid to give away free. Parson Posey denied the charges and indicted Brownlow for libel. Brownlow had been rather bold to act as he did in this Baptist community, and he should have expected the decision which the court handed down. The case was tried at Franklin, in Macon County, North Carolina. According to Brownlow the judge was "corrupt and drunken," and even worse, a Baptist, so he fined Brownlow $5 and the costs. The Parson felt able to pay the $5 and he reckoned the costs to be negligible, so he went about his·business of preaching, worrying none about the court's decision. But one Sunday morning while he was in the midst of a meeting, "a corrupt and inexperienced deputy sheriff," with a bill of exhorbitant costs, run up by a great horde of Baptist witnesses who had been summoned with­ out Brownlow's knowledge, levied upon all the Parson's avail­ able worldly possessions and seized them-"an elegant dun mare, saddle, bridle, saddle-bags, and umbrella." This trick rankled deep in Brownlow's soul, and he never forgot it. He declared this trial and the subsequent proceedings to be an outrageous travesty on justice, the like of which had never disgraced the annals of mankind since the trial of William Penn at Old Bailey, excepting possibly the persecutions of John Wesley at Savan­ nah, and of Lorenzo Dow at Charleston.9 Twenty years later the Parson took an inventory of the "wicked crew" who had done this deed to him, and to his great delight he found just what he expected: The judge had died "in a drunken fit of debauch"; Parson Posey had before his II Ibid., pp. 257, 259, 261, 269-72; J. P. Arthur, WeBtern North Oarolina, A Hillory; MSS Archives of Macon County, I<'ranklin, N. C. A NEW PARSON RIDES THE CIRCUIT ~8 earthly departure, turned into "a wretched and raving maniac"; one of the jurors "died, drunk in the woods"; another was serv­ ing a sentence in the penitentiary for store-breaking; another had fled the country to escape prosecution for forgery; and still another guilty of perjury was in hiding to escape just punishment. As for the remainder of these corrupt jurors, he had not heard from them for a time, "but the probability is, the Devil has those of them, who have departed this life, while the living ones are likely in some state prison!" Thus, had the Lord finally vindicated the name of one of His chief circuit­ riding parsons.10 But unjust trials and court decisions could never stop Par­ son Brownlow or dampen his ardor for carrying Methodism to the people. The year 1833 became historic on account of a strange manifestation of nature so unusual that the tradition concerning it has lasted down to the present generation, even among the unlettered in the most out-of-the-way places. This was "the year the stars fell." This beautiful display of comets produced great excitement in the Southern Highlands and led the more curious to seek explanations. Some of the Baptists soon guessed that this had been a sign placed in the heavens to indicate the downfall of the Methodists, but one Hopkinsian lady had what she considered a more plausible explanation. She had heard that Parson Brownlow had died, and in some way had squeezed into heaven, and on his entry he had created such a disturbance that he was put out. But this ejection in being accomplished had jarred loose from their moorings all the stars which came tumbling headlong to earth.ll The Annual Conference in 1882 was held in Evensham, Vir­ ginia, presided over by Bishop John Emory. The Bishop shifted Brownlow slightly to the southeast to the Tugaloo Circuit, which lay mostly in Pickens District, South Carolina, but partly in Georgia. The Parson was soon convinced that he could do very little good here since the whole region was "overrun with Baptists." Nevertheless he was determined to try. He swam the 10 KnoZ'Dille Whig and Independent Journal, July 5, 1851. 11 Brownlow, Helps to the Study of Presbyterianism, pp. 276-77. se4 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW Tugaloo River four times in "the dead of winter" and preached more than once with his wet clothes frozen stiff about him. Once he was nearly swept over the shools and "was in a squirrel's jump of the good world." But over in the Georgia part of his kingdom he saw something which delighted his nature-loving soul; it was the "Telulee Falls."12 Never had he "witnessed a scene which struck my mind with such profound awe, and so completely filled me with admiration of the infinite skill of the great Architect of nature." It was the general report that they were more grand than Niagara. He could scarcely describe the effect they had upon him, but it seemed to him after looking at them for a while that he felt a desire to reach the eternal world to see the Maker of such a wonderful work of nature.1S While on the Tugaloo Circuit in Pickens and Anderson dis­ tricts, Brownlow came as near the lowlands of the slaveholding planters as he had ever before approached; he was 'on the verge of running out of his beloved mountains. He would naturally look with misgiving upon these aristocrats, but the time of his arrival was most unpropitious for the planters. They were in the midst of their Nullification Movement, and Brownlow im­ mediately turned away with loathing detestation. He was a Unionist; he had ridden the circuit in five states and had not got out of the Holston Conference of the Methodist Church in doing it. He loved all these states equally well, scarcely knowing or caring when he passed from one into another. If South Caro­ lina should successfully defy the United States Government she might break up the Union and the Holston Conference with it. He bitterly opposed this heresy, and years later declared that the movement had been engineered by the descendants of the Tories of the Revolution. He charged that more Tories had lived in South Carolina "than in all the other States put together." The Parson was not surprised to find that all the Presbyterians and Baptists were Nullifiers and that they were boldly announcing that Christ was a Nullifier. The insignia 13 Nature was, indeed, in a grand mood at Tallulah Falls; but twentieth cen­ tury Georgians, having more shriveled souls than the Parson, destroyed this beautiful cataract, turning its wasted power into electricity. 13 Brownlow, Helps to the Study of Presbyterianism, pp. 268-69. A NEW PARSON RIDES THE CIRCUIT 25 of the Nullifiers was a blue cockade. To help along the cause the Parson aided some Unionists in pinning these cockades on the tails of the worthless curs of the neighborhood that they might carry high Nullification. Starved out by the Nullifiers, Brownlow was glad to retreat back into the Union-loving moun­ tain region, but before going, according to his word, he took a parting shot at them in a pamphlet, for which, he claimed, they tried to hang him.14 The government of the Methodist Church provided for the governmental meetings known as "conferences"-(l) a quar­ terly conference in each district, (2) an annual conference in each regional division, which embraces a number of districts and which as a region is called a conference, and (3) a quadren­ nial conference embracing all the regional divisions, or confer­ ences, in the whole United States. These meetings gave the min­ isters a chance to show themselves to their fellows, they gave more tone and respectability to the backwoods circuit riders, and they afforded a chance for the play of ambition for future preferment. It fell within Brownlow's easy reach to attend the quarterly and annual conferences, and through the very nature of his irrepressible self he became well-known at these meetings within the annual Holston Conference, and succeeded in get­ ting this group to appoint him a delegate to the General Con­ ference to meet in Philadelphia in 1832. Here was a glorious opportunity to see what the big world outside of Southern Appalachia looked like. The Conference no doubt thought that if Brownlow should ever become properly tamed he might de­ velop into a mighty man in Methodism, whose influence would extend far beyond the Holston Conference. In doing this elon­ gated mountaineer of only twenty-seven years so high an honor they sought indirectly to tame him, but at the same time they were direct and frank with him. They mildly condemned him for his caustic style of writing in the newspaper controversies he got into and for his wild and unbridled manner of opposing H Ibid., pp. 265-66; Parson Brownlow's Book, pp. 21-23. I have never been able to discover a copy of this pamphlet or to see a reference to it except in Brownlow's claim. According to the Parson his pamphlet contained 70 pages and was entitled, Suffering of Union ]len. See Portrait and Biography, p. 44.. !!6 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW the other denominations. This condemnation was not made greater than the Parson could bear, for his very condemners were guilty more or less of the same oft'enses.15 In the spring of 183~ the Parson quit for a time his riding around in circles and set out on a bee line for Philadelphia, more than six hundred miles away. He started early enough to stop on the way, to see the sights. His first great objective was Washington. He spent a week at his country's capital, viewing the sprawling muddy town, and listening to the oratory of con­ gressmen. Being quite an important man himself, he decided to pay a visit to Andrew Jackson, in the White House. Two Ten­ nesseeans so far away from home ought to be mutually glad to see each other. Brownlow seemed to be duly impressed with the height of Jackson, and he thought perhaps for that reason that he was "a very fine looking old man"-but he left with the feel­ ing that he could not quite approve of the President. The Par­ son, being a Whig in the making, had never voted for Jackson, so perforce he could never approve of such a person. Having turned his thumbs down on the first citizen of the land, Brown­ low continued his journey on to Baltimore where he again busied himself looking at the sights. He was attracted by the peni­ tentiary, and on seeing so many people who could not run away, he immediately asked permission to preach to them. He slyly contrived to get the report carried back to his enemies in Ten­ nessee that he was in the penitentiary in Baltimore-a fate they had long been predicting and hoping for. At last he arrived in Philadelphia where he spent the whole month of May. He likely found more sights here than at any other place he had visited, and without a doubt he himself was a sight for many of his more urbane brothers in Methodism. When not sitting with his own Conference or viewing other o1:Jjects of interest, he slipped over to the Presbyterian Assem­ bly, which happened to be meeting in the same city. Of course, nothing good could come from Presbyterians nor would looking at them and listening to them aft'ord anything more than amuse- 16 Price, op. cit., III, 316, 318; Journals of the General Conference of the Jfethodist Epucopal Church, 1,362. A NEW PARSON RIDES THE CIRCUIT 27 ment. He heard wrangles among them "which would, for intem­ perance of language and wholesale abuse of private character, absolutely disgrace the lowest porter house, or ale cellar, in the lowest place in the lowest town or city in the lowest country in the world." The Parson took an extremely inconspicuous part in his own Conference. There is no record in the minutes of his having introduced a motion or seconded one or even spoken a word. He was appointed on no committees. Perhaps Bishop Soule, who presided much of the time, had suppressed Brownlow -or could he possibly have been awed by this august body? His only accomplishment in the Conference, which he ever men­ tioned, and later regretted, was his aid in getting James O. Andrew elected bishop.16 After the Parson had seen Washington, Baltimore, and Phila­ delphia, it might well be guessed that his circuit-riding days would soon come to an end; and, indeed, he was destined to ride only three more circuits-the Dandridge, around the confluence of the Holston and French Broad rivers; the Scott, in South­ west Virginia; and the Elizabethton, in the extreme northeast­ ern tip of Tennessee.17 Brownlow was coming to believe that he was important enough to be written about; his name had been heralded all over South­ ern Appalachia and even to far-away Philadelphia. He imag­ ined that people must want to know more about himself, so in the absence of any biographers, he decided that he would write his own biography, though his scope of life had yet been less than thirty years. He entitled his work, A Narrative of the Life, Travels, and Circumstances Incident Thereto, of William G. Brownlow.I8 True enough this autobiography was an appendix to a larger work which he called Helps to the Study of Presby- 16 Brownlow, Helps to the Study of Presbyterianism, pp. 262-64; Irreligious Oharacter of the Rebellion. An Address by Parson Brownlow. Delivered before the Young Men'B Ohristian Association, at Oooper In.'{titute, New York, May 19,1862, p. 28; Journals of the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Ohurch, I, 362-423. 17 For the record of Brownlow's itineracy see MinuteB of the Annual Oonfer­ enCeS of the Methodist Episcopal Ohurch for the YearB 1829-1839, I, 518. 519, 550; ibid., II, 12, 13, 52, 90, 133, 181,234,300,366,430. See also Brownlow, HelplI to the Study of Presbyterianism, pp. 275-89. 18 This work embraced 53 pages. ~8 WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW terianism or, an Unsophisticated Exposition of Calvinism, 'With Hopkinsian Modifications and Policy, with a View to a More Easy Interpretation of the Same. To Which is Added a Brief Account of the Author, Interspersed with Anecdotes. This work was printed for him by Frederick S. Heiskell, at Knoxville in 1884. The Parson was very frank with himself in his Life. Never having heard of psychoanalysis, he made no attempt to put himself through that process, but he was willing to state his case in the best manner of which he was capable. He listed the principal objections that had been urged against him as: his inconsistency of character, a quarrelsome nature, his style as a writer, talents as a preacher, and manners as a man, and a dis­ like by great numbers of people. He vigorously defended him­ self against every charge. As to his quarrelsome disposition, "I pretend not to be a candidate for the honors of martyrdom, yet, 1 should feel that 1 had gone down to my grave disgraced, did 1 not incur the censure and abuse of bloated bigotry, and priestly corruption." And, whether people liked him or not, he cared little: "I never professed to have a great deal of polish about me, nor do 1 desire to be polite." With a sort of a wounded feeling, he added, "I never thought 1 was a great man-I never desire to be what the world calls a great man." The Parson may have misread himself a slight bit here; his whole subsequent career was proof that he had a craving for power over people but perhaps, not so much for adulation as for vengeance.19 For a long time his wrath had been piling up against the Presbyterians. He had been dealing with the other wing of the Calvinistic forces, the Baptists, in a rough and tumble method; but the Presbyterians had been writing things against his re­ ligion, and he would now show them that there was at least one Methodist who could also write, and who would write without restraint if need be. One activity which he especially disliked was a publication called the Calvinistic jfagazine, edited by J ames Gallaher, Frederick A. Ross, and David Nelson, who hurled this missile at the l\lethodist Church from their stronghold 18 Brownlow, Helps to the Study of Presbyterianism, pp. 290-94. A NEW PARSON RIDES THE CIRCUIT ~9 in Rogersville, East Tennessee, in the midst of the Brownlow country. As they entered upon this undertaking the very first year the Parson began riding the circuit, doubtless he con­ sidered it a direct thrust at him and his work. They began their first number with the prayer of a crusader and closed it with a declaration of war against all who denied the doctrines of the Presbyterian Church. Warfare it would be, between truth and falsehood. We are commanded to hold a controversy with the sinfulness of our hearts, and it is equally obligatory to contend against error wherever we find it. Written discussions, upon religious subjects, are never to be deprecated, for error has never progressed so rap­ idly, as when the watchmen upon the walls of Zion, remain silent and inactive. It will be said, controversy produces unchristian feel­ ings, and that it brings before the public, the differences of those who worship the same Lord and follow the same Saviour. The first objection is strong, only, against those who attempt to find truth without asking for the holy aid of the Spirit of truth. The second objection is plausible, but deceitful, because, falsehood, in moral opinion, is sin, whether it is seen in the belief of an infidel or a christian. No man can reject the doctrines taught by Christ and his apostles and be guiltless.20 They quoted with approval the dictum of a contemporary, "The fact is, whatever progress the cause of truth and holiness has made in the world, has been made by controversy."21 This magazine carried on an offensive against the Methodists by ridicule and by all the other weapons it could command. In a skit entitled, "A Dialogue Between a Methodist and a Cal­ vinist," the follower of J ohn Wesley was demolished with ridi­ cule and contempt.22 Through four numbers in 18~8 this maga­ zine reviled and mocked the l\fethodists in "Dialogues on Church Government Between a Citizen and a Methodist Circuit­ Rider.,,23 The trinity of Presbyterian divines who edited this 20 P. 31. The Oalvinistic Magazine came out monthly. 1Il Oalvinistic Magazine, vol. II, no. 10 (October, 1928), p. 298. d Vol. I, no. 5 (May, 1827), pp. 145-49. lIIIl Vol. II, nos. 4-7 (April-July, 1828). 30 WILLIAM: G. BROWNLOW magazine published the following as a typical verse in a Method­ ist songbook: "The Devil, Calvin, and Tom Paine, l\JIay hate the Methodists in vain; Their doctrines shall be downward hurl'd­ The Methodists shall take the world.,,24 The wonder is that the Fighting Parson, as he was later to be called,25 showed so much self-restraint and desisted so long from entering the fray. The Presbyterians had long been pes­ tering him, and just to prove how contentious they were, he wrote for the N eUJmarket Telegraph, a Tennessee newspaper, an article proving there was a God; and according to the Par­ son, a Presbyterian immediately denied that eternal truth.26 But now, in the year 1834, he resolved to buckle on the armor of the Lord and go out to do battle with the infidel Presbyterians and all other Calvinists. He had written his book, and in a styIe that many people might not like. As for his "exuberance and redundancy of language," he gladly admitted that they might "be justly considered one, among the many other 'Winning 'Ways I have to make folks hate me." He, too, believed in religious controversy-"had it not been for controversy, Romish Priests would now be feeding us with Latin masses and a 'Wafer godf"27 Brownlow selected some of the principal Calvinistic doctrines and savagely attacked them. The ones to which he gave his par­ ticular attention were: that God decrees whatever comes to pass, that there is unconditional election and reprobation, that Christ died only for the elect, that there is irresistible grace to bring in the elect, and that it is impossible to fall from grace. To show how absurd and even sacrilegious these doctrines were, the Par­ son called attention to these two facts: that if God decrees all things, then he produces murders, lying, and sins of all kinds; and that if people are already saved or damned from the begin­ ning, what good is there in preaching or carrying'on missionary 24VoL III, no. 12 (December, 1829), p. 383. m George D. Prentice is said to have given Brownlow this title. Putnam's lrlag­ azine, vol. III, no. 16 (April, 1869), p. 528. 1I6 Brownlow, Helps to the Study of Presbyterianism, p. 279. l!1 Ibid., pp. xii, viii. A NEW PARSON RIDES THE CIRCUIT 81 work?28 If it be foreordained that certain people are to be saved, why baptize them; "they will be saved if they never see water, and die drunk in the bargain !,,29 In order to escape these hard and irresistible conclusions, many of the Presbyterians had run off into what came to be called Hopkinsianism, a name given to the doctrines promulgated by Samuel Hopkins, of Newport, Rhode Island, in order to soften and side-step some of the more severe tenets of Calvinism.30 But Brownlow was particularly interested in showing what a terrible threat the Presbyterian Church organization carried against the liberties and political institutions of the United States. He called attention to the fact that the Presbyterians and the New England Congregationalists were all of a feather in their general doctrines and ambitions, that during the War of 181~ New England had been pro-British and her ministers had preached disloyal sermons, and what was most ominous of all, that at one time New England had had a virtual union of church and state which bond the Presbyterians were now secret­ ly praying to be restored throughout the nation. He greatly feared this Presbyterian plot, for if it succeeded they would soon be burning people as heretics. They were already referring to the regions where the l\fethodists were strongest as "great moral wastes." In his opinion, "There is indeed no bigotry so intol­ erable as religious bigotry, nor any hatred so unrelenting as religious hatred." He sounded the warning: "Let the Presby­ terians once enslave us, as they are aiming to do, and we may whine, and scold, and murmur, and wince, and threaten, and beseech them to condescend, graciously to have mercy on us, but it will all be to no purpose."31 The Parson had not allied himself with the Jeffersonian school in politics and he had generally not looked to Thomas Jefferson for his ideas but he was in perfect agreement with the 118 Ibid., pp. 208-9. 1& W. G. Brownlow, The Great Iron Wheel E:I!aminedj or, Its False Spokes E:ctracted, and An E:I!hibition of Elder Graves, its Builder, in a Series of Ohapters, p. 173. 30 Ibid., p. 216. For the nature of this doctrine, see Nathan Bangs, A History of the ]rlethodist Episcopal Church, III, 11-29. "t Brownlow, Helps to the Study of Presbyterianism, pp. vii, 94, 113-65, 167-76. 3~ WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW Sage of Monticello on the subject of Presbyterianism. He was delighted to find this paragraph in a letter Jefferson had written to William Short in 18~O, and he quoted it with approval: "The Presbyterian clergy are the loudest; the most intolerant of all sects, the most tyrannical and ambitious; ready at the word of the lawgiver, if such a word could be now obtained, to put the torch to the pile, and to rekindle in this virgin hemisphere the flames in which their oracle Calvin consumed the poor Servetus...."32 But Brownlow was not depending on Thomas Jefferson or on any other person for his proof of how wicked the Presby­ terians were or of their insidious attempt to unite church and state, with themselves at the helm. A great many societies and organizations had been springing up with ostensible religious uplift programs, but the wary Parson knew too well that if one should dig deep enough it would soon be evident that Presby­ terians were in charge of all of them, and that these organiza­ tions were gigantic tentacles to draw the people unaware into one great Presbyterian consolidation. There was the American Sunday School Union, generally referred to by Brownlow as the A. S. S. Union, which, according to reports, was non-de­ nominational, but which Brownlow knew was controlled by the Presbyterians for the sneaking purpose of entering politics and winning elections. The American Tract Society was got up and controlled by the Presbyterians, though it claimed to have all the principal denominations represented in it. Brownlow knew this claim to be a subterfuge, for did not the Methodists have a tract society of their own? The American Bible Society was con­ trolled by the Presbyterians. It claimed to be giving away Bibles, but Brownlow knew that the Presbyterians and their Calvinistic co-conspirators, the Baptists, were actually selling these Bibles and growing rich from plundering the poverty­ stricken seekers after religion. He had charged as much against Parson Posey at Franklin, North Carolina, and the only reason he had not proved his charges was because a Baptist was the U Ibid., p. 179. This letter may be found in T. J. Randolph, ed., Memoir, Oor­ re,,)(mdtlBCB, and Milcellaniel, from (fie Paper8 of Thomal Jefferson, IV, 322. A NEW PARSON RIDES THE cmCUIT 83 judge. No true Christian could obj eet to the American Tem­ perance Society, but Parson Brownlow predicted that the Presbyterians would soon control it, for they were "a set of infatuated fanatics." As for the Baptists, they were actually against temperance, but he explained that situation on the ground that they were "about a century behind the march of mind."3s The American Education Society was also under the domi­ nation of these self-seeking Presbyterians. Brownlow was not opposed to education, if it were not of the Calvinistic variety. "Ignorance," he declared, "never produced one item of felicity to any man; the opinions of the Roman Catholics and Baptists