Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. Experiencing Defeat, Remembering Victory: The Army of Tennessee in War and Memory, 1861-1930
Details

Experiencing Defeat, Remembering Victory: The Army of Tennessee in War and Memory, 1861-1930

Date Issued
August 1, 2016
Author(s)
Glaze, Robert Lamar  
Advisor(s)
Stephen V. Ash
Additional Advisor(s)
Luke E. Harlow
Daniel Feller
Martin Griffin
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/25020
Abstract

This dissertation explores the meaning of the Civil War in the South by examining white Southerners’ perceptions of the Army of Tennessee from 1861 to 1930. While scholarship on the war’s memory is immense and growing, little of this literature examines the memory of the Confederacy's war effort in the western theater—the area of operations military historians now deem central to the war's outcome. This project rectifies that oversight by examining white Southerners’ memory of the Army of Tennessee in the post-war decades. Unlike Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia, the Confederacy’s primary western field army suffered a near endless string of battlefield defeats and a revolving door of incapable, egotistical, and irascible commanders. Its wartime record is hardly complimentary to the Lost Cause which insisted on the martial, moral, and masculine superiority of Confederate officers and soldiers.


An examination into the popular historical memory of the Army of Tennessee reveals two significant developments that change our understanding of how post-war white Southerners conceptualized the Confederate war-effort and processed the trauma of defeat. First, despite historians’ insistence that white Southerners focused their attention and memories on Lee and his army, the western theater occupies a more prominent place in the post-war Confederate mind than previously thought. Second, unlike that of the eastern army, the Army of Tennessee’s memory was constructed in a fragmented manner that allowed for the circumvention of its wartime record. For the army to maintain both prevalence in Confederate memory and synchronicity with the Lost Cause narrative of the war, it could not be remembered in the same holistic manner as “General Lee’s Army.” In focusing their memories on isolated moments, contingencies, units, or individuals—as opposed to the army as an inclusive institution—ex- Confederates succeeded in reconciling the army’s record with the Lost Cause.

Subjects

Civil War

Army of Tennessee

Memory

Albert Sidney Johnsto...

Disciplines
Cultural History
Military History
Other History
Social History
United States History
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
History
Embargo Date
August 15, 2017
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Glaze_Dissertation__Grad_School___2_.pdf

Size

1.29 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

a2779889a3622759472830eae36228b4


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science