Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. Data fusion through fuzzy reasoning applied to feature extraction from multi-sensory images
Details

Data fusion through fuzzy reasoning applied to feature extraction from multi-sensory images

Date Issued
December 1, 1992
Author(s)
Abdulghafour, Muhamad B.
Advisor(s)
M. A. Abidi
Additional Advisor(s)
J. M. Bailey
D. W. Bouldin
Y. Kuo
M. Trivedi
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/18974
Abstract

Multi-sensor systems provide a purposeful description of the environment that a single sensor cannot offer. Fusing several types of data enhances the recognition capability of a robotic system and yields more meaningful information otherwise unavailable or difficult to acquire by a single sensory modality. Because observations provided by sensors are uncertain, incomplete, and/or imprecise, we adopted the use of fuzzy sets theory as a general framework to combine uncertain measurements. We developed a fusion formula based on the measure of fuzziness. The fusion formula was mathematically tested against several desirable properties of fusion operators. We established a fuzzification scheme by which different types of input data (images) would be modeled. This modeling process was essential in providing suitable predictions and explanations of a set of observations in a given environment. A defuzzification scheme was carried out to recover crisp data from the combined fuzzy assessment. This approach was implemented and tested with real range and intensity images acquired by an Odetics Laser Range Scanner. The goal was to obtain better scene descriptions through a segmentation process of both images. Despite the low resolution of the input images and the level of noise associated with the acquisition process, the segmented output picture should be suitable for recognition purposes. Other data fusion approaches such as the Super Bayesian Approach (SBA) and Dempster's rule of combination were implemented and evaluated. A systematic method for evaluating and comparing segmentation results was presented. Various levels of noise were added to the real data and segmentation results from all three approaches were compared and evaluated. The strengths and weaknesses of each method in combining evidence and managing uncertainty were discussed.

Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Electrical Engineering
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Thesis92b.A236.pdf

Size

14.46 MB

Format

Unknown

Checksum (MD5)

d3f3b8185e7964942480f65c775a2401

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify