Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. Comparison of herbicide programs in imidazolinone tolerant corn
Details

Comparison of herbicide programs in imidazolinone tolerant corn

Date Issued
May 1, 1999
Author(s)
Walker, Eric Ray
Advisor(s)
Thomas C. Mueller
Additional Advisor(s)
Robert M. Hayes
G. Neil Rhodes Jr.
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/42993
Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1998 at Jackson, Milan, Knoxville, and Spring Hill, Tennessee, to examine several herbicide programs for weed control in imidazolinone-tolerant corn. Field corn variety FFR 797 IMI was no-till or minimum-till planted at all locations. The treatments were replicated four times in a randomized block design. Treatments ranging from a PRE-only to PRE followed by postemergent (POST) to total POST applied to examine weed control, crop injury, and yield. Crop oil concentrate (COC) was combined with atrazine when applied POST, while nonionic surfactant was added to all other POST treatments. Visual evaluations were taken four weeks after treatment to evaluate control of broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash), large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop), Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri (S.) Wats), pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa L.), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby). None of the treatments controlled sicklepod at Milan due to high population density (600-5000 plants/m2). Imazethapyr + imazapyr + dicamba POST and atrazine + metolachlor PRE followed by prosulfuron + primisulfuron + nicosulfuron POST controlled these weeds while imazethapyr + imazapyr POST, imazethapyr + imazapyr + pendimethalin POST, and atrazine + metolachlor PRE followed by flumetsulam + clopyralid + nicosulfuron POST controlled all weeds >86% except Palmer amaranth (<67%). Imazethapyr + imazapyr + nicosulfuron POST failed to control Palmer amaranth and only controlled sicklepod 75% at Spring Hill. Atrazine + metolachlor PRE followed by nicosulfuron POST did not control Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory but controlled all other weeds. Atrazine + metolachlor PRE followed by dicamba POST failed to control broadleaf signalgrass and pitted morningglory, but controlled large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, and sicklepod. Imazethapyr + imazapyr + atrazine POST controlled all weeds except pitted morningglory (71%), while atrazine + crop oil concentrate controlled the dicot weeds but had little monocot activity. Nicosulfuron + rimsulfuron + atrazine POST controlled broadleaf signalgrass and Palmer amaranth, but only partially controlled pitted morningglory control. Sicklepod was controlled at Knoxville but not at Spring Hill by the mixture of these three herbicides. Although atrazine + metolachlor PRE controlled broadleaf signalgrass and sicklepod at Knoxville, the treatment did not control all other weeds at Jackson and Spring Hill. Corn yields were reduced at Milan from sicklepod competition. Yields were also low for treatments that did not provide adequate large crabgrass and Palmer amaranth control. Slight corn injury was observed but did not appear to influence corn yields.

Degree
Master of Science
Major
Plant, Soil and Environmental Sciences
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

uc_id_1f4C9wv45cWBHTnYYPUsth4dtT0J7_fEN_export_download.pdf

Size

5.85 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

8163f4243505570d04279e7fff6a45b2


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science