Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. GIS Modeling of Forest Cover Distributions in a Southern Appalachian Watershed
Details

GIS Modeling of Forest Cover Distributions in a Southern Appalachian Watershed

Date Issued
December 1, 1995
Author(s)
Rutledge, Daniel Thomas
Advisor(s)
Monica Turner
Additional Advisor(s)
Hazel R. Delcourt
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/39307
Abstract

This study develops a method to model forest cover distributions in the Little Tennessee River Watershed in Macon County, North Carolina using a geographic information system (GIS). The model employs common environmental variables, e.g. elevation, aspect, and slope, and a newly developed metric called a topographic index. The topographic index quantifies landscape form to reflect the degree of site convexity or concavity. To generate index values, the GIS sums relative aspect differences between all adjacent cells and the center cell in a neighborhood analysis. To determine predominant community types and their environmental ranges in the study area, I surveyed canopy trees, small trees, and saplings on 216 10 x 10 m plots located throughout the watershed.


TWINSPAN identified eight community types: Birch-Hemlock, Basswood-Birch, Tuliptree, Red Oak-Hickory, White Oak-Black Oak, Chestnut Oak, Chestnut Oak-Red Oak, and Chestnut Oak-Black Oak. All communities showed strong association with the topographic index. Most showed strong association with elevation and a general preference for either N/NE/E or S/SW/W aspects. No overall relationship with slope was apparent. Field and GIS values for elevation and aspect correlated well, but slope data differed markedly. A discriminant analysis identified topographic index, elevation, and aspect as significant predictive variables of forest cover types. Classification success depended on the number of forest cover types in the analysis. Two cover types produced a success rate of 84%; four produced 64.8%, six produced 48.8%, and eight produced 40.8%. Several factors could account for the decrease in successful classification including inadequacy of the topographic index, spatial resolution of the GIS data, the clusters produced by TWINSPAN, the need for additional significant predictor variables, or the failure to account for disturbance regimes. Overall the topographic index provides a quantitative, objective, and reliable measurement of landscape form. Further research should increase its usefulness and applicability to other studies.

Disciplines
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Degree
Master of Science
Major
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Embargo Date
December 1, 1995
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

RutledgeDanielThomas_1995_PDFA.pdf

Size

33.37 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

210894d36a1283b1b7bcacb2eab17014


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science