Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in marriage
Details

Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in marriage

Date Issued
December 1, 1980
Author(s)
Jacobs, Ellen Rachael
Advisor(s)
Kenneth R. Newton
Additional Advisor(s)
Ohmer Milton
Alice Moses
Robert Wahler
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/22189
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether interpersonal behavior in the marital relationship is related to the degree of sex-role typing that characterizes behavior in other context. A group of subjects married 2-5 years was compared with a group married 20+ years in order to assess the additional effects that the length of such a commitment (marriage) might have on behavior.

Each subject's sex-role category was based on responses to a bi-polar assessment of masculine and feminine characteristics. With this method, a separate score is obtained for each subject's level of masculine-typed characteristics (the instrumental, assertive domain) and feminine-typed characteristics (the expressive, receptive domain). The degree to which the subject (male or female) behaves in each domain then determines the sex-role category: masculine-typed, feminine-typed, androgynous, or undifferentiated.

Using a checklist of interpersonal variables, subjects indicated how they behave toward their spouses. These variables, which provide measures of power and affiliation, are related respectively to masculinity and femininity. Together they account for the full range of interpersonal behaviors: from dominance through submission (power) and from affection through hostility (affiliation).

The major finding of the study was that most subjects did not see themselves as bound in the marital relationship by the limits of the sex-role characteristics they reported in the other context of their lives. Marriage does provide a context for a different interpersonal experience and theoretically, a broader self-definition. The specific findings indicate that this flexibility generally seems to be more related to the affiliation dimension than the power dimension, so that the frequency of masculine-typed behaviors is more consistent across relationships than feminine-typed behaviors. This pattern seems to reverse itself with increased length of marriage, however, which suggest changes in the importance and/or usefulness attributed to each dimension.

The system of sex-role classification may include too wide a range of behaviors in each group to assume within group similarities. and it is also criticized for the probability of errors in categorizing. However, it is a vast improvement over traditional measures of masculinity and femininty, and consequently deserve, further attention.

Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Psychology
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Thesis80b.J236.pdf

Size

3.5 MB

Format

Unknown

Checksum (MD5)

c8a10b84df879b1426c84bcfb0149031


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science