Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. They Made Us Unrecognizable to Each Other: Human Rights, Truth, and Reconciliation in Canada
Details

They Made Us Unrecognizable to Each Other: Human Rights, Truth, and Reconciliation in Canada

Date Issued
December 1, 2014
Author(s)
Kim, Jaymelee Jane  
Advisor(s)
Tricia R. Hepner, Dawnie W. Steadman
Additional Advisor(s)
Amy Z. Mundorff
Joshua Inwood
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/24235
Abstract

Presented herein are the findings from an ethnographic analysis of the perceived efficacy of Canada’s transitional justice framework; an approach being used to address human rights violations that occurred via the Indian residential school system. With these findings and archival research, I argue that transitional justice is not perceived as an effective solution for nation-states with long histories of colonialism and institutional violence. From the 1840s until 1996, Canadian Aboriginals suffered forced assimilation, sexual abuse, and physical abuse in government-sponsored and church-administrated boarding schools. The Canadian government began to actively address these crimes in 2006 with the negotiation of the Indian Residential School Settlement Agreement. The agreement utilizes transitional justice tools (e.g. monetary reparations, investigative truth and reconciliation commission, grave excavation) typically employed in countries undergoing a transition in political regimes or from war to peace.


Using a transitional justice framework and based on data gathered primarily in the lower mainland of British Columbia, this research 1) uses critical discourse studies to analyze the use of "reconciliation" by various stakeholders, and how varying definitions affect perceptions of transitional justice, 2) discusses how knowledge production influences perceptions of transitional justice on the ground and the associated research; 3) uses a lens of structural violence to argue that transitional justice is not perceived as an effective tool in and of itself by marginalized groups when employed in a colonial context; and 4) contends that when applying a universal transitional justice framework to local contexts, structural violence and neocolonialism can be used to problematize the narrative that is produced.

Contributing to critical anthropological debate, this research investigates the sociopolitical factors that influence transitional justice in a non-transitioning society that operates with a legacy of institutionalized discrimination and colonization of Native peoples. Broadly, these findings can inform the applied work of transitional justice facilitators, including government officials, lawyers, and anthropologists.

Subjects

transitional justice

indigenous rights

human rights

forensic investigatio...

reconciliation

post-colonial

Disciplines
Anthropology
Indigenous Studies
Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Anthropology
Embargo Date
January 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Jaymelee_Kim___Dissertation_Requesting_Acceptance_to_Grad_School.pdf

Size

1.92 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

52214582063072d0a190f3e64fb84606

Thumbnail Image
Name

Jaymelee_Kim___Dissertation_for_Submission.docx

Size

1.99 MB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

37d0f11c68d6246ae2b5d60fe4804025


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science