Interpreting the interpreter : case studies of ten intuitive D-A-P interpreters

This study used a multiple-perspective approach to study intensively ten people's ways of being, with reference to their skill or lack of skill in intuitive interpretation. A Draw-A-Person interpretation task was used to identify good and poor intuitive interpreters. The subjects were then assessed using a variety of open-ended and standardized methods and measures. The open-ended methods of assessment included self-descriptions, an artpreference task, a series of interviews, and a creativity task. The standardized measures were an IQ estimate, the Interpersonal Check List, the Concealed Figures test, the Personality Research Form, and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

The poor interpreters were found to have in common a concern with control that was not seen among the good interpreters. Specifically, the poor interpreters sought control over non-discursive experiences such as dreaming, daydreauning, and "losing distance," suggesting a lack of openness to such experiences.

The relevance of the concept of "regression in the service of the ego" (RISE) to intuitive interpretation was discussed. Results suggest that, while the capacity for RISE may sometimes enhance intuitive interpretive ability, such regression is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for making accurate intuitive interpretations. Beyond any regression that occurs, the person must be able to re-emerge and again make contact with the object in the world that is the focus of interest. Furthermore, the data suggest that it is possible to function intuitively without experiencing any such regression, by maintaining an attitude of open, interested engagement with the object in the world, and remaining close to one's direct experience of that object.

An "attitude of openness in turning toward the object" was discussed as a counterpoint to the desire for control. It was suggested that this attitude of openness may be a primary and essential aspect of being intuitively receptive.