Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. A Regression Analysis of Australopithecine Dentition
Details

A Regression Analysis of Australopithecine Dentition

Date Issued
December 1, 1979
Author(s)
Ranyard, Gail Celmer
Advisor(s)
Fred H. Smith
Additional Advisor(s)
Douglas W. Owsley
William M. Bass
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/40323
Abstract

The permanent dentition of all known Australopithecines (except those from Hadar) are examined for size trends related to temporal and geographic variation. The Australopithecine sample is divided into four major groups for analysis: gracile Australopithecines, robust Australopithecines, ''Homo", and unknown. Mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions for each tooth are then subjected to regression analysis. To discern temporal variation in tooth size for any of the taxonomic groups, a regression of tooth size with the median date of the specimen is performed. In order to elucidate dental variation related to geographic location, a regression analysis of tooth size with the latitude and longitude location of the hominid is undertaken.


The posterior dentition of the robust group appears to significantly increase in size through time whereas the gracile and "Homo" groups show a decrease in the anterior dental dimensions when analyzed separately, and exhibit a decrease in posterior tooth size when a combined analysis is performed. Metric variation related to geographic location of the specimen is not as easily interpreted as the temporal variation. The few dental dimensions which proved to be significantly related to location in East or South Africa were obtained by a combined analysis of all taxonomic groups in East Africa and all taxonomic groups in South Africa. Generally, molars tend to be larger in the southwestern region of South Africa and incisors show increased dimensions in the southwestern region of East Africa. Molar dimensions are largest in northeastern East Africa.

With our present knowledge, variation in tooth size cannot be related to macroenvironmental differences among these Plio-Pleistocene hominids, nor to dietary factors or differential tool use. Body size differences and craniofacial evolution are viewed as possible explanations for the various trends in the dentition related to temporal variation. Climatic factors could be partly responsible for dental size trends based upon geographic location of the specimen.

Disciplines
Anthropology
Degree
Master of Arts
Major
Anthropology
Embargo Date
December 1, 1979
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

RanyardGailCelmer_1979_OCRed.pdf

Size

5.26 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

01e34cd6d8616744820414616c15b4cb


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science