Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. To the Indian Removal Act, 1814-1830
Details

To the Indian Removal Act, 1814-1830

Date Issued
August 1, 2013
Author(s)
Stephens, Kyle Massey
Advisor(s)
Daniel Feller
Additional Advisor(s)
Stephen V. Ash, Lynn Sacco, Michael R. Fitzgerald
Abstract

This dissertation offers a history of Indian removal as a political issue from the War of 1812 to the signing of the Indian Removal Act in 1830. Its central argument is that federal removal policy emerged and evolved due to a precise and largely unforeseen sequence of events. Drawing on Indian treaties, journals of negotiations, minutes of cabinet meetings, Congressional debates, personal memoirs, and a variety of other sources, the dissertation charts and elucidates the evolution of United States Indian policy from a diplomatic to a domestic concern. One of the central themes of the dissertation is how most white statesmen gradually, once Anglo-American dominion was established east of the Mississippi River after the War of 1812, abandoned long-held notions of “assimilation” and instead viewed the American Indian communities as the quintessential “other.”


Chapter 1 examines American-Indian relations at the outbreak of the War of 1812. It argues that the federal government’s policy toward the Native Americans was both contradictory and incompatible with the nation’s desire for western expansion. Chapter 2 describes the establishment of American hegemony in eastern North America during and immediately after the War of 1812. Chapter 3 considers the efforts of the James Monroe administration to reform the contradictory modes of interacting with the Indians. It argues that these efforts were stymied by the determination of Georgia to remove all Indians from their state, which led to clashes between the federal government and the state over Indian affairs. Chapters 4 and 5 discuss the fraudulent Treaty of Indian Springs, conducted with the Creeks in 1825, and its aftermath. They argue that the controversy over the treaty and its subsequent annulment created a political environment in which removal came to be viewed by the majority of politicians as the only solution to the tensions both in the American government and in the southern borderlands. Chapter 6 argues that Andrew Jackson inherited an unofficial policy of Indian removal in 1829 and describes the efforts of his administration to codify removal as official policy. Chapter 7 delineates the debate over the removal bill in Congress and the subsequent vote.

Subjects

Indian Removal Act

antebellum politics

U.S. government

public policy

Disciplines
Diplomatic History
Legal
Political History
United States History
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
American History
Embargo Date
January 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Kyle_M_Stephens__To_the_Indian_Removal_Act__1814_1830__Complete_Dissertation__July_2013_.docx

Size

385.8 KB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

6b27279fbcaa353c7175971bc2cdea7a

Thumbnail Image
Name

kstephensfinal.pdf

Size

1.09 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

eccb8c1a91d84a0cf070e7d16e69c1fd

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify