Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. Reflective Practice, Collaboration, and Stakeholder Communication: Where Does the Field of Evaluation Stand?
Details

Reflective Practice, Collaboration, and Stakeholder Communication: Where Does the Field of Evaluation Stand?

Date Issued
August 1, 2014
Author(s)
Smith, Tiffany Lee  
Advisor(s)
Gary J. Skolits
Additional Advisor(s)
John M. Peters
Ralph G. Brockett
Lisa T. Fall
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/23928
Abstract

The current study provides insight into the state of the field of evaluation regarding practitioners’ understanding and application of reflective practice (RP), one of six essential competencies in program evaluation identified and discussed by Stevahn, King, Ghere, and Minnema (2005). Specifically, the purpose of this study was to determine how professional evaluators view RP, the extent and manner in which they engage in RP behaviors, and how evaluators conceptualize whether RP efforts affect, if at all, the evaluation process. Through a snowball sample, nineteen highly experienced evaluators took part in an hour long interview. These interviews with evaluators who have been practicing evaluation for ten or more years offered a broader understanding of where professionals in the discipline stand with regard to RP in evaluation. Overall, participants conceptualized RP as both an intuitive and purposeful learning process that includes thinking, questioning, self-awareness, and multiple perspectives. Participants reported using RP for communicating and sharing with others or with the evaluation community, for thinking about their work personally, for evaluation of their work, and through the use of professional guidelines. Participants reported that RP is not specific to any part of the evaluation process but is instead a process that continues throughout the evaluation as well as after the fact. With regard to collaboration, participants discussed involving stakeholders and evaluation clients, evaluation team members, and colleagues in the process of RP, both formally and informally. Typically they collaborated for the purpose of feedback or learning and for thinking through the evaluation together. Limitations of the study are addressed, and implications for practice and recommendations for future research are provided.

Subjects

reflective practice

reflection

collaboration

program evaluation

Disciplines
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Educational Psychology
Embargo Date
January 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Doctoral_Dissertation_FINAL.pdf

Size

813.55 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

a55b29942eede8a579fc9b5ebbbb62a6

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify