A Critique of John McDowell's Theory of Moral Perception
This dissertation examines an argument that John McDowell’s view is structurally analogous to Protagoreanism, and that arguments structurally analogous to Plato’s arguments against Protagoreanism apply to McDowell’s view. Through philosophical investigation, the dissertation shows that Plato’s arguments do not perfectly apply to McDowell’s view, but that the view nevertheless is unable to address the metastasized problem of constraint. The metastasized problem of constraint arises in at least two kinds of circumstances: situations where cultural relativism is a concern, and situations where there is pressure to adapt to unforeseeable natural developments.
Falls_Dissertation_FINAL_VERSION_071621.docx
207.56 KB
Microsoft Word XML
7f998a05749042fb9f4d0c3218595c44
auto_convert.pdf
791.02 KB
Adobe PDF
51b8d480b4644b2c0884398bd5a4db09