Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work
  3. Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects
  4. Identifying Misidentifications: Fordisc 3.1 Application to Korean Crania
Details

Identifying Misidentifications: Fordisc 3.1 Application to Korean Crania

Date Issued
May 1, 2025
Author(s)
Springer, Addison
Advisor(s)
Dr. Yangseung Jeong
Subjects

Fordisc

Korean

Population Affinity

Disciplines
Biological and Physical Anthropology
Major
Anthropology|||Anthropology: Concentration in Forensics
Comments

When cases are of unknown identity or race, determining the population of the individual significantly increases the chances of determining the identity of that victim. Forensic anthropologists have been using skeletal methods to estimate population affinity for decades. Fordisc (Jantz and Ousley 2005) is the primary method used by forensic anthropologists when building biological profiles for forensic cases. The results from Fordisc are assumed by users to be accurate, however, Fordisc can often yield misleading results or incorrect affinities. This means that the use of Fordisc to estimate population affinity is potentially misleading the biological profiles of forensic cases. Fordisc has only thirteen populations to compare cranial measurements to (five female and eight male), so if a case is outside of those populations, it is impossible for Fordisc (Jantz and Ousley 2005) to provide an accurate affinity. This study aims to find a pattern in the outputs produced when the cranial measurements are from a population not within the populations available. The measurements of 365 cases, 219 males and 146 females, were provided by the National Forensic Service in South Korea for use in this study. The craniometric data will be entered in the application following standard protocols. We expect the craniometric data to yield low probabilities or indecisive results. We hypothesize that the cranial measurements will affiliate with Japanese, Guatemalan, and Chinese crania due to the close regions and morphological history of the populations. We will conduct a statistical analysis of the typicality probabilities and posterior probabilities provided to find potential patterns in the output that indicate the affiliation could be incorrect. Even though we are unable to fix the programming of the application, if forensic anthropologists can begin to notice the possibility of misleading outputs, then the biological profiles will not be impeding the investigations.

Embargo Date
May 15, 2025
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Capstone_Final.docx

Size

156.8 KB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

3c4a2fc4a0ffa67fb61e53b03fa3efeb

Thumbnail Image
Name

auto_convert.pdf

Size

415.42 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

3505eef8248b29e22aa53fbbdf90370c

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify