Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. An Ethics of Amusement
Details

An Ethics of Amusement

Date Issued
May 1, 2021
Author(s)
Mobley, Ashley Caroline  
Advisor(s)
Kristina Gehrman
Additional Advisor(s)
Jon Garthoff, Clerk Shaw, Garriy Shteynberg
Abstract

Human beings often hold one another morally responsible for what we find funny or fail to find funny. Though this practice is common and so demands philosophical attention, it remains underexplored in the literature. The purpose of this project is to devote attention to this practice by developing an ethics of amusement.


In chapter 2, I argue for why amusement is an emotion according to incongruity theory—the dominant theory of humor and amusement. With this in mind, I argue in chapter 3 that we are responsible for our emotions insofar as we have emotional agency. In particular, while we cannot change our emotions at will, we still exercise various forms of control over them in specific moments and over time. To the extent that we can do otherwise with respect to our immediate emotions and our long-term emotional tendencies, we are responsible for them.

In chapter 4, I develop three criteria that individuals must meet for their emotions to be fitting. In some cases, an instance of fitting emotion may be praiseworthy: if it comes from a correct shift in values or from a morally good character. In some cases, an instance of an unfitting emotion may be blameworthy: if it comes from a character flaw.

Based on the criteria in chapter 4 and the discussion of incongruity theory in chapter 2, I develop three criteria for fitting amusement in chapter 5. Using the same grounds for praise, I examine examples of fitting immediate amusement and show why praise is or is not merited. I also consider when failing to find something funny is fitting and praiseworthy in some cases: when offense comes from a good moral character.

Finally, in chapter 6, I analyze unfitting immediate amusement and unfitting tendencies for amusement. I consider examples and who when and why blame is or is not merited. Lastly, I discuss why failing to be amused may be unfitting and blameworthy in some cases: when offense comes from a character flaw. I conclude with a brief discussion about some practical applications for the criteria I developed.

Subjects

Humor

Funny

Moral

Character

Virtue

Incongruity

Disciplines
Applied Ethics
Ethics and Political Philosophy
Other Philosophy
Philosophy of Mind
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Philosophy
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Mobley__An_Ethics_of_Amusement.docx

Size

164.4 KB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

5d4ab6a9e23d2dd57ffc7f4140f284f7

Thumbnail Image
Name

auto_convert.pdf

Size

869.78 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

a22dd278f001145ba52fb78615f6ca10

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify