Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. Efficacy of Endo-Fighter® for Cattle Grazing Endophyte-Infected Tall Fescue Pastures During Summer and Early Fall
Details

Efficacy of Endo-Fighter® for Cattle Grazing Endophyte-Infected Tall Fescue Pastures During Summer and Early Fall

Date Issued
May 1, 2008
Author(s)
Norman, Rebekah
Advisor(s)
John C. Waller
Additional Advisor(s)
Clyde D. Lane
Kelly R. Robbins
Link to full text
http://etd.utk.edu/2008/NormanRebekah.pdf
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/40296
Abstract

Two 84-day grazing trials were conducted (Aug 24 – Nov 17, 2006; Jun 14 - Sept 7, 2007) near Spring Hill, TN to determine the efficacy of Endo-Fighter (R), an ADM Alliance Nutrition, Inc. product designed to be fed to cattle grazing or fed endophyte-infected fescue or hay and Prototype, an improved version of Endo-Fighter (R). Tall fescue pastures with >90% of pasture exhibiting infestation (E+), thus producing high concentration of ergot alkaloids in the grass, were grazed.


In 2006 sixty weaned crossbred heifers (325 ± 17 kg) (2007, steers, 267 ± 18 kg) were used in a randomized block design (2007, CRD), blocked by previous treatment and randomly allotted to pastures with four animals per 1.2-ha paddocks and five replications per treatment. Treatments were ADM Alliance Nutrition, Inc. mineral products: 1) Mastergain (R) mineral = Control; 2) Endo-Fighter (R) mineral; 3) Prototype mineral. Animals had free choice access to E+ grass, water and shade.

Heifers were weighed on d 0, 1, 28, 56, 83, and 84 (2006) and on d 0, 1, 22, 43, 64, and 85 (2007). In 2006 data collected were initial, d 28, d 56, and final weights, and ADG. In 2007 data collected were initial, d 22, d 43, d 64, and final weights, and ADG for each period. Blood serum was collected at each weigh date for prolactin analysis. Mineral consumption and animal grazing behavior were determined at 14-d intervals. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. For all variables, contrasts were performed to compare Control to mineral supplements containing Endo-Fighter (R) or Prototype.

In 2006 total ADG (kg) and average daily mineral consumption (g) were: 0.61, 170*; 0.56, 122*; 0.50, 146; for Control, Endo-Fighter (R) and Prototype, respectively (*P < .09). In 2007 data were 0.61, 134; 0.57, 147; 0.56, 116; for Control, Endo-Fighter (R), and Prototype, respectively. For both years, serum prolactin was not different (P > 0.05) among treatments. Animal performance and prolactin levels were not significantly affected by the feeding of Endo-Fighter (R) or Prototype in these trials. However, lack of response to Endo-Fighter (R) and Prototype in 2006 may have been attributed to mild weather conditions. In 2007 lack of response may have been a result of extreme heat and drought conditions.

Disciplines
Animal Sciences
Degree
Master of Science
Major
Animal Science
Embargo Date
December 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

NormanRebekah.pdf

Size

445.69 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

f31fd1a78950f600c723b5ed3d61ac87

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify