Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. Examining Regression Analysis Beyond the Mean of the Distribution using Quantile Regression: A Case Study of Modeling the Internal Bond of Medium Density Fiberboard using Multiple Linear Regression and Quantile Regression with an Example of Reliability Methods using R Software
Details

Examining Regression Analysis Beyond the Mean of the Distribution using Quantile Regression: A Case Study of Modeling the Internal Bond of Medium Density Fiberboard using Multiple Linear Regression and Quantile Regression with an Example of Reliability Methods using R Software

Date Issued
August 1, 2007
Author(s)
Shaffer, Leslie Brooke
Advisor(s)
Timothy M. Young
Additional Advisor(s)
Frank Guess, Ramón León
Abstract

The thesis examines the causality of the central tendency of the Internal Bond (IB) of Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF) with predictor variables from the MDF manufacturing process. Multiple linear regression (MLR) models are developed using a best model criterion for all possible subsets of IB for four MDF thickness products reported in inches, e.g., 0.750”, 0.625”, 0.6875”, and 0.500”. Quantile Regression (QR) models of the median IB are also developed.


The adjusted coefficient of determination (R2 a) of the MLR models range from 72% with 53 degrees of freedom to 81% with 42 degrees of freedom, respectively. The Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) range from 6.05 pounds per square inch (p.s.i.) to 6.23 p.s.i. A common independent variable for the 0.750” and 0.625” products is “Refiner Resin Scavenger %”. QR models for 0.750” and 0.625” have similar slopes for the median and average but different slopes for the 5th and 95th percentiles. “Face Humidity” is a common predictor for the 0.6875” and 0.500” products. QR models for 0.6875” and 0.500” indicate different slopes for the median and average with different slopes for the outer 5th and 95th percentiles.

The MLR and QR validation models for the 0.750”, 0.625” and 0.6875” product types have coefficients of determination for the validation data set ( R2validation ) ranging from 40% to 60% and RMSEP ranging from 26.5 p.s.i. to 27.85 p.s.i.. The MLR validation model for the 0.500” product has a R2validation and RMSEP of 64% and 23.63 p.s.i. while the QR validation model has a R2validation and RMSEP of 66% and 19.18 p.s.i. The IB for 0.500” has departure from normality that is reflected in the results of the validation models. The thesis results provide further evidence that QR is a more defendable method for modeling the central tendency of a response variable when the response variable departs from normality.

The use of QR provides MDF manufacturers with an opportunity to examine causality beyond the mean of the distribution. Examining the lower and upper percentiles of a distribution may provide significant insight for identifying process variables that influence IB failure or extreme IB strength. Keywords.

Disciplines
Statistics and Probability
Degree
Master of Science
Major
Statistics
Link to full text
http://etd.utk.edu/2007/ShafferLeslie.pdf
Embargo Date
December 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

ShafferLeslie.pdf

Size

483.92 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

ca082a27b91ce90635c7d5002232dcc4

Learn more about how TRACE supports reserach impact and open access here.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify