Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. Spatially Explicit Population Estimates of the Florida Black Bear
Details

Spatially Explicit Population Estimates of the Florida Black Bear

Date Issued
May 1, 2017
Author(s)
Humm, Jacob Michael  
Advisor(s)
Joseph D. Clark
Additional Advisor(s)
Lisa I. Muller
Arnold M. Saxton
John M. Zobel
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/40879
Abstract

The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) is currently comprised of 7 isolated subpopulations: Apalachicola, Eglin, Osceola, Ocala/St. Johns, Chassahowitzka, Highlands/Glades, and Big Cypress. The last statewide assessment of Florida black bear population dynamics was conducted by Simek et al. (2005) using traditional capture-markrecapture methods. The subspecies was removed from Florida’s List of State Threatened Species in 2012 contingent upon the formulation of a management plan that would maintain viable subpopulations of black bears in suitable habitat. Accurate population estimates for each of the remaining black bear subpopulations in Florida were needed to achieve the management goals of this plan.


I used spatially explicit capture-recapture (SCR) within a maximum likelihood inference framework to estimate population density (D) and abundance (N) for the Osceola, Ocala/St. Johns, Eglin, Apalachicola, and Big Cypress subpopulations; these 5 subpopulations constitute the bulk of the statewide population. I constructed genetic capture histories for each subpopulation from genotyped hair samples taken from barbed-wire sampling stations (henceforth referred to in this document as hair snares). I used a 3 × 3 hair snare cluster layout with 2 km between hair snares and 16 km between cluster centers. I created covariates of density from land use/land cover (LULC) data to model heterogeneity in density across study areas. Model-averaged population estimates were 120.3 bears (95% CI = 61.1 – 269.1) or 0.025 bears/km2 [bears per square kilometer] (95% CI = 0.013 – 0.056) for the Eglin subpopulation, 1,060.3 bears (95% CI = 825.4 – 1,385.9) or 0.082 bears/km2 (95% CI = 0.064 – 0.107) for Apalachicola, 492.9 bears (95 % CI = 319.5 – 792.4) or 0.127 bears/km2 (95% CI = 0.082 – 0.203) for Osceola, 1,192.6 bears (95% CI = 950.8 – 1,519.5) or 0.127 bears/km2 (95% CI =0.101 – 0.161) for Ocala/St. Johns, and 1,037.4 bears (95% CI = 756.1 – 1,444.6) or 0.131 bears/km2 (95% CI = 0.096 – 0.183) for Big Cypress. Effects of covariates on density estimates varied among study areas. The total population estimate was 3,908.8 bears (95% CI = 2,916.2 – 5,425.8). The cluster sampling method allowed abundance to be estimated across extensive areas that would not have been possible otherwise.

Subjects

Florida black bear

spatially explicit ca...

Florida

abundance

density

cluster sampling

Disciplines
Other Environmental Sciences
Other Statistics and Probability
Population Biology
Degree
Master of Science
Major
Wildlife and Fisheries Science
Embargo Date
January 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Thesis_Humm_01.06.2017.pdf

Size

2.38 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

64fa138641ee7d75753c1bbe322b6a55

Thumbnail Image
Name

Thesis_Humm_11.8.2016.docx

Size

3.12 MB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

0ea3d58a073cbde93662980d529fbe3b


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science