Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. Telecommuting In Higher Education: An Examination of the Decision-Making Factors
Details

Telecommuting In Higher Education: An Examination of the Decision-Making Factors

Date Issued
May 1, 2002
Author(s)
Snodgrass, Phyllis Joy  
Advisor(s)
Jacquelyn O. DeJonge
Additional Advisor(s)
Ernest W. Brewer
W. David Penniman
John M. Peters
Vickie J. Stout
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/22424
Abstract

The purpose in conducting this study was to research some of the factors that influence the decision whether or not to adopt a telecommuting program in the higher education setting. The study examined some organizational characteristics and the perceived constraints and motivators that could influence adoption (or not) of a telecommuting program at an institution. The study also examined the current perceptions of success of recruiting and retaining information technology staff at each institution. A post hoc survey was developed by the researcher to gather information about the motivators and constraints involved in adoption of telecommuting programs. A total of 102 respondents from a sample of 181 (population of 347) provided an overall response rate of 62.19%. The study was conducted exclusively in the higher education setting. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, and means, were used to report demographic information and to also analyze some of the research questions. Further analysis of the survey information included Spearman’s Rho, t test, and chi-square. Major findings of the study were: (a) Research University I institutions were found to be more likely to have a telecommuting program; Master’s Universities and Colleges I’s comprised the highest percentage of non-adopters followed by Associate of Arts Colleges, (b) budget cuts had a significant effect on recruiting success but no statistically significant effect was found on retention success, (c) adopters and non-adopters of telecommuting reported that “improvement of overall (employee) benefits” was or would be the primary motivator for adoption of telecommuting, (d) adopters reported cost of program implementation and legal issues as the primary constraints to adoption (e) non-adopters cited various reasons for not adopting that included a program was in the planning states, an informal program was already in place, there was not perceived need or suitable jobs, and negative issues would be or had been raised about telecommuting, (f) 62.5% of existing telecommuting programs were periodically evaluated, (g) the adoption of a telecommuting program was not related to more positive results in recruiting and retention of information technology staff, and (g) correlation coefficients indicated a positive relationship between the perceived level of success in recruiting and retention of IT staff and the success of the adopted telecommuting program, but not a statistically significant one.

Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Human Ecology
Embargo Date
January 1, 2001
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

SnodgrassPhyllis.pdf

Size

908.66 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

5de0c53f9e914a3bff1a271c29091af7

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify