Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. Artificial Nutrition and Hydration for Infants with Life-Terminating Conditions: Rethinking the Catholic Position
Details

Artificial Nutrition and Hydration for Infants with Life-Terminating Conditions: Rethinking the Catholic Position

Date Issued
December 1, 2011
Author(s)
Uhl, L William
Advisor(s)
John R. Hardwig
Additional Advisor(s)
Glenn C. Graber
Richard E. Aquila
Alfred D. Beasley
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/20652
Abstract

Infants with life-terminating conditions (ILTCs) are those whose conditions prevent them from living more than two years. When these infants have difficulty assimilating food and fluids orally, doctors can provide nutrition and hydration through artificial means. While artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) can provide benefits, it can also result in complications leading to pain and/or distress in addition to that which an ILTC may already be experiencing from one or more underlying conditions.


Many medical experts maintain that withholding or withdrawing ANH can help a patient’s body produce its own analgesics. I consider four categories of ILTCs: 1) infants who receive prognoses of two weeks or less; 2) infants who will live longer than two weeks but no more than two years and who are not suffering or in distress; 3) infants who are not dying, but are in distress from the use of ANH; and 4) infants who are not dying, but are in distress from their conditions and/or ANH. I argue that in addition to providing natural analgesics, withholding or withdrawing ANH is a form of comfort care that prevents the occurrence of further complications requiring additional medical treatments and keeps ILTCs content. Under certain circumstances, the withholding or withdrawing of ANH should be obligatory.

As it stands, the whole of Catholic teaching on ANH is inconsistent. Operating from the sanctity-of-life ethic, the Church teaches that ANH is an ordinary, therefore obligatory, form of care. But this position contradicts the view that any form of care presenting a grave burden to a patient and/or his family is extraordinary and therefore optional. In addition, by making ANH obligatory, the Catholic Church causes families to undergo heroic suffering (i.e., enduring more than what can be expected or asked of anyone), which the Church says is not required of everyone. I argue that rethinking the Catholic position on ANH will enable the Church to offer practical moral guidance for families to comfort ILTCs, help ILTCs and their families avoid heroic suffering, and provide spiritual care families of ILTCs need, all while still respecting the sanctity of life of every person.

Subjects

Artificial Nutrition ...

Infants

Catholic

Ordinary

Extraordinary

Palliative Care

Disciplines
Ethics and Political Philosophy
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Philosophy
Embargo Date
December 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

20111112_Uhl_ANH_ILTCs_RCP.docx

Size

249.94 KB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

756b0809d137cad8e41a5b27e00cebef

Thumbnail Image
Name

auto_convert.pdf

Size

554.6 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

b2f86e0e5807d57fc483d3454e969eec

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify