Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. College of Arts and Sciences
  4. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
  5. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Publications and Other Works
  6. Estimating ancestry and heterozygosity of hybrids using molecular markers
Details

Estimating ancestry and heterozygosity of hybrids using molecular markers

Date Issued
July 31, 2012
Author(s)
Fitzpatrick, Benjamin M.  
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/16999
Abstract

Background


Hybridization, genetic mixture of distinct populations, gives rise to myriad recombinant genotypes. Characterizing the genomic composition of hybrids is critical for studies of hybrid zone dynamics, inheritance of traits, and consequences of hybridization for evolution and conservation. Hybrid genomes are often summarized either by an estimate of the proportion of alleles coming from each ancestral population or classification into discrete categories like F1, F2, backcross, or merely “hybrid” vs. “pure”. In most cases, it is not realistic to classify individuals into the restricted set of classes produced in the first two generations of admixture. However, the continuous ancestry index misses an important dimension of the genotype. Joint consideration of ancestry together with interclass heterozygosity (proportion of loci with alleles from both ancestral populations) captures all of the information in the discrete classification without the unrealistic assumption that only two generations of admixture have transpired.

Methods

I describe a maximum likelihood method for joint estimation of ancestry and interclass heterozygosity. I present two worked examples illustrating the value of the approach for describing variation among hybrid populations and evaluating the validity of the assumption underlying discrete classification.

Results

Naively classifying natural hybrids into the standard six line cross categories can be misleading, and false classification can be a serious problem for datasets with few molecular markers. My analysis underscores previous work showing that many (50 or more) ancestry informative markers are needed to avoid erroneous classification.

Conclusion

Although classification of hybrids might often be misleading, valuable inferences can be obtained by focusing directly on distributions of ancestry and heterozygosity. Estimating and visualizing the joint distribution of ancestry and interclass heterozygosity is an effective way to compare the genetic structure of hybrid populations and these estimates can be used in classic quantitative genetic methods for assessing additive, dominant, and epistatic genetic effects on hybrid phenotypes and fitness. The methods are implemented in a freely available package “HIest” for the R statistical software ( http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/HIest/index.html webcite).

Disciplines
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Recommended Citation
BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012, 12:131 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-131
Embargo Date
July 12, 2013
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

1471_2148_12_131.pdf

Size

868.83 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

74c86fd1d8773cb1e51d7f9e4788b162


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science