Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. Teaching Evaluator Competencies: An Examination of Doctoral Programs
Details

Teaching Evaluator Competencies: An Examination of Doctoral Programs

Date Issued
May 1, 2012
Author(s)
Kaesbauer, Susanne Anna Maria
Advisor(s)
Jennifer Ann Morrow
Additional Advisor(s)
Clea McNeely, Gary Skolits, Sky Huck
Abstract

Program evaluators may currently enter the field of evaluation through a variety of avenues. Entry into the profession at this time is uncontrolled by a professional body of evaluators, as an evaluator certification process does not yet exist in the United States of America. One avenue for evaluators to enter into the profession is through a graduate training program in evaluation. This study sought to understand the preparedness of evaluators who enter the profession in this manner. Specifically, this study aimed to determine the current state of the teaching of evaluator competencies, across 26 doctoral evaluation programs in the United States. A descriptive multi-method multi-sample approach was chosen for this study. Results revealed students, faculty and syllabi most frequently addressed other competencies, followed by competencies related to the Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators (ECPE) framework and the Canadian Evaluation Society (CES) framework. Moreover, students, faculty and syllabi most frequently listed teaching or learning about data collection analysis and interpretation and evaluation analysis, planning and design competencies. Project management and ethics competencies were addressed or encountered least frequently by all three sources. However, students encountered technical competencies most frequently and non-technical competencies least frequently, whereas, both faculty and syllabi most frequently mentioned teaching technical competencies and non-technical competencies related to communication. Moreover, students, faculty and syllabi listed teaching or encountering competencies most frequently in lectures and associated activities and assignments. Nevertheless, students least frequently reported learning competencies in practical/field experiences, whereas, faculty and Syllabi stated students learned competencies through practical or field-experiences. Study limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

Subjects

Competencies

Teaching

Evaluation

Disciplines
Curriculum and Instruction
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Educational Psychology and Research
Embargo Date
January 1, 2012
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Dissertation_FINAL_041312_2.doc

Size

1.16 MB

Format

Microsoft Word

Checksum (MD5)

a392fab692088ef47afa1f0ecd565eef

Thumbnail Image
Name

auto_convert.pdf

Size

584.62 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

20c20029f765f5a55cea0a4bc08b1c99

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify