Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. Theories-in-use and espoused theories: An examination of team decision-making in the initial special education eligibility meeting
Details

Theories-in-use and espoused theories: An examination of team decision-making in the initial special education eligibility meeting

Date Issued
August 1, 2015
Author(s)
Stewart, Heather Anne  
Advisor(s)
John M. Peters
Additional Advisor(s)
Pamela Angelle
Melinda Gibbons
Mary Ziegler
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/24592
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether education professionals’ theories-in-use were congruent with their espoused theories (Argyris & Schön, 1974) regarding the inclusion of parents as team decision-making partners in the initial special education eligibility meeting of individualized education programming (IEP) teams. Particular attention was given to procedural practices education professionals used to include parents as decision-making partners and their descriptions of this practice.


The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) mandates the inclusion of parents as members of IEP teams, including their right to participate in the special education eligibility decision. Research supports the inclusion of parents as essential members of IEP teams, and their active participation is reported as pivotal for their children’s positive educational and social outcomes. Local education agency (LEA) representatives, special education teachers, and school psychologists are responsible for including parents in eligibility decision-making; thus they were the focus of this study.

A total of 24 education professionals in eight schools from three Southeastern school districts constituted the research participants. Participants were observed in initial eligibility meetings and responded to a questionnaire and interview questions with descriptions of their procedural practices. Findings showed that education professionals’ described practices were more aligned to federal requirements than were their actual practices. Findings also showed that a subgroup of participants, LEA representatives, had limited knowledge of special education procedures.

Implications of the study include the need for additional training designed to strengthen education professionals’ alignment of actual and espoused theories, particularly in the area of including parents as team decision-making partners.

Subjects

decision-making

eligibility meetings

theories-of-action

Disciplines
Educational Psychology
School Psychology
Special Education and Teaching
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Educational Psychology and Research
Embargo Date
January 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

0-Consultants___Questions_and_Reminders_Part_2.docx

Size

19.2 KB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

8e6fa813073de0feb02eea8d3875ef8e

Thumbnail Image
Name

1-Consultants___Questions_and_Reminders_Part_2.docx

Size

19.2 KB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

8e6fa813073de0feb02eea8d3875ef8e

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify