Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. Stretching with whole body vibration versus traditional static stretches to increase acute hamstring range of motion
Details

Stretching with whole body vibration versus traditional static stretches to increase acute hamstring range of motion

Date Issued
August 1, 2011
Author(s)
Bourne, Anastasia Elizabeth
Advisor(s)
Dixie L. Thompson
Additional Advisor(s)
Eugene C. Fitzhugh, Clare C. Milner
Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine if performing static active knee extension hamstring stretching using the Pneumex Pro-Vibe vibrating platform increased acute hamstring range of motion (ROM) greater than traditional static active knee extension hamstring stretching. METHODS: A within subject design was utilized with subjects undergoing static stretching with vibration and without vibration (conditions counterbalanced). Pre- and post-test active and passive ROM was measured for the right leg, with subjects first undergoing a 5-minute warm-up on a stationary bicycle. Supine active knee extension was performed on the Pro-Vibe platform with and without vibration. The stretch was held 3 times each for 30 seconds, with a 20-second rest period between each stretch. Vibration was set at 30 Hz at the “high” amplitude setting. Active hamstring ROM was measured via active knee extension using a goniometer with the leg in 90° of hip flexion. Passive ROM was measured via clinician-assisted knee extension with the leg in 90° of hip flexion. RESULTS: A 2-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed for passive ROM, and revealed a significant main effect for condition, F (1, 23) = 0.5875, p < 0.05, and time, F (1, 23) = 5.029, p < 0.05. Another repeated measures ANOVA was performed for active ROM with the same factors, and revealed a significant time by condition interaction, F (1, 23) = 4.730, p < 0.05, and a significant main effect for time, F (1, 23) = 18.612, p < 0.001.


Post-hoc paired samples t-tests determined the difference between the pre-test and post-test measurements for each condition. Active ROM showed a significant difference pre-test to post-test for the vibration condition, t (23) = -5.41, p < 0.001. The vibration condition also resulted in significantly different pre-test vs. post-test measurements on passive ROM, t (23) = -2.55, p < 0.05. In both cases the average ROM was higher for the post-test. DISCUSSION: Three 30-second active knee extension hamstring stretches using a vibrating platform are sufficient to cause significant acute increases in hamstring ROM. These findings suggest this device may be useful when desiring increased hamstring ROM.

Subjects

hamstring stretching

static stretching

vibration

passive range of moti...

active range of motio...

Disciplines
Musculoskeletal System
Other Rehabilitation and Therapy
Physical Therapy
Degree
Master of Science
Major
Kinesiology
Embargo Date
December 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

BourneAnastasiaAug2011.docx

Size

4.02 MB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

13296508e0657812572cb51b5c0a44ae

Thumbnail Image
Name

BourneAnastasiaAug2011.pdf

Size

1.77 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

6ed508f1ff9c7c64a0eac0d28d13d35c

Learn more about how TRACE supports reserach impact and open access here.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify