Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. ENHANCED EFFICIENCY NITROGEN FERTILIZER AS TOOL TO CONTROL NITROGEN LOSS IN ROW CROP PRODUCTION
Details

ENHANCED EFFICIENCY NITROGEN FERTILIZER AS TOOL TO CONTROL NITROGEN LOSS IN ROW CROP PRODUCTION

Date Issued
May 1, 2024
Author(s)
Okai, Samuel Kudzo  
Advisor(s)
Nutifafa Adotey
Additional Advisor(s)
Daniel Yoder, Lori Duncan, Debasish Saha, Frank Yin
Abstract

The efficiency of urea-based fertilizers is substantially reduced through nitrogen (N) losses via ammonia volatilization. Soil pH, clay content, soil organic matter (SOM), and field capacity can affect ammonia loss. Incubation experiments were conducted on eight soils using a controlled environment system to study the effects of soil properties on ammonia volatilization from urea and urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) applied at 134.5 kg N/ha. Each experiment was set up as a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Ammonia loss was measured on 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 16 DAF (days after N application). Cumulative losses of ammonia from UAN and urea ranged from 1.4 - 18.1 % and 10.5 - 26.5 % of total N applied, respectively. Cumulative ammonia losses from urea were higher than UAN in six soils, but the losses were similar for both urea and UAN in the remaining soils. Stepwise regression analysis predicted soil pH and clay content as the most parsimonious model for ammonia loss from both urea and UAN applications. The same experimental setup was used to evaluate the efficacy of different enhanced efficiency N fertilizer (EENF) products in mitigating ammonia volatilization losses in two soils highly susceptible to ammonia volatilization losses. The EENF sources included Urea+ANVOLTM, UAN+ANVOLTM, ESN®, SUPERU®, and urea+Excelis® which were surface-applied at 134.5 kg N/ha. Cumulative ammonia loss from the EENF products ranged from 3.3 – 10.6 % in soil 1 and 2.2 – 16.1 in soil 2 (% of applied N). Treated urea products were effective in reducing ammonia volatilization loss (% of applied N) by 60.63 – 87.62 and 32.26 – 90.96 % for soils 1 and 2, respectively, when compared to untreated urea. Similarly, the treated UAN reduced ammonia volatilization loss by 26.90 and 69.51 in soils 1 and 2, respectively when compared to untreated UAN. The effectiveness of the EENF treatments in both soils was: ESN® > UAN+ANVOLTM > urea+ANVOLTM > urea+Excelis® > SUPERU®. Reliable EENF products are a viable tool to reduce N losses as ammonia, regardless of soil properties.

Subjects

Enhanced efficiency N...

ammonia volatilizatio...

urea

urea ammonium nitrate...

Disciplines
Agronomy and Crop Sciences
Degree
Master of Science
Major
Environmental and Soil Sciences
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Masters_thesis_final_submission.docx

Size

9.23 MB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

4dc86b9908e924472be7dceaa261d772

Thumbnail Image
Name

auto_convert.pdf

Size

1.05 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

38a43929938a4fc7abf1fae69e0039ca

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify