Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. Delving Deeper into Substance Use: Affect Regulation, Defenses, and Personality Factors Influencing Drug Choice in Addictions
Details

Delving Deeper into Substance Use: Affect Regulation, Defenses, and Personality Factors Influencing Drug Choice in Addictions

Date Issued
May 1, 2012
Author(s)
Colman, Lindsey Kate
Advisor(s)
Michael R. Nash
Additional Advisor(s)
David A. Patterson
Gregory L. Stuart
John Lounsbury
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/19836
Abstract

According to E. J. Khantzian’s (2003) theory of Self-Medication, substance addiction functions as a compensatory means to modulate affects and self-soothe in response to distressing psychological states. Khantzian’s theory has two main components: 1) addictive drugs
become addicting because they have the power to alleviate, remove, or change (and in turn control) human psychological suffering, and 2) there is a considerable degree of specificity in a person’s choice of drugs, and individuals gravitate to a certain drug because of its psychological
and physiological effects (Khantzian & Albanese, 2008). This project tests the tenets of Khantzian’s (2003) Self-Medication theory in a treatment sample of addicts (N = 304), using content and supplementary scales of the MMPI-2, the PAI, and YSQ. Using an algorithm based on medical records, addicted individuals were reliably classified as being either addicted to a Depressant, Stimulant, or Opiate. Based on Self-Medication theory, I predicted the three groups would function in different ways across combinations of the following variables: Subjective Depression, Psychomotor Acceleration, Post-Traumatic Stress, Over-controlled Hostility, Cynicism, Aggression, Paranoia, Antisocial Tendencies, Emotional Inhibition, Insufficient-Self Control, and Ego Strength. I used MANOVAs to test three theory-driven hypotheses regarding drug group differences on the personality variables. The MANOVAs for hypothesis I (Depressant versus all other addicts) and hypothesis II (Opiate versus other) were statistically significant. The MANOVA for hypothesis III (stimulant versus other) was non-significant. Across the three hypotheses, there were 18 a priori Univariate predictions. Of these, 17 were in the predicted direction, nine were statistically significant. These multivariate and Univariate findings partially support the Self-Medication theory, particularly in its characterization of personality functioning of those addicted to Depressants and Opiates.

Subjects

substance use

co-morbidity

personality

self-medication

Disciplines
Clinical Psychology
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Psychology
Embargo Date
December 1, 2011
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

DISSERTATION_FINAL_WITH_REVISIONS___Colman_1.docx

Size

181.49 KB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

c72be106fdb34cda5e4ae6624719bfac

Thumbnail Image
Name

auto_convert.pdf

Size

468.01 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

1fd769ca60c868bc0e9b3cbd56ac36fd

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify