Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Doctoral Dissertations
  5. A differential analysis of the perceived social impacts of a world's exposition
Details

A differential analysis of the perceived social impacts of a world's exposition

Date Issued
August 1, 1980
Author(s)
Meissen, Gregory J.
Advisor(s)
John W. Lounsbury
Additional Advisor(s)
William H. Calhoun
Eric Sundstrom
Kent D. Van Liere
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/22223
Abstract
The primary purpose of this study was to assess and compare the perceived differential social impacts of the 1982 International Energy Exposition (EXPO 82) on different subgroups of community residents. A model was developed for this research that drew from Melvin Seeman's alienation theory, the perspective of community psychology, as well as past social impact research. This model was also used to examine attitudes toward EXPO 82 and political activity related to EXPO 82. A secondary purpose of the study was to obtain a baseline of community residents' beliefs about potential social impacts, and attitudes toward EXPO 82, in order to allow assessment of changes in these subjective dimensions that could accompany the ongoing construction and operation of EXPO 82.

Beliefs about the likelihood and desirability of potential social impacts resulting from EXPO 82, political efficacy, attitudes toward EXPO 82, level of knowledge of EXPO 82 specifics and reported EXPO political activity were measured by interviewing a random sample of 335 community residents. Subgroups of respondents were developed and their beliefs about potential positive and negative social impacts were compared using one-way analysis procedures. A path analysis was also performed to examine the effects of SES and alienation on beliefs about potential social impacts, attitudes toward EXPO 82 and political activity related to EXPO 82.

Both the high general political efficacy and the high EXPO political efficacy groups anticipated a greater likelihood of positive impacts and a lesser likelihood of negative impacts, when compared to the low political efficacy respondents. Respondents in the low socioeconomic group expected a lesser likelihood of positive impacts, when compared to the high socioeconomic group, but both groups anticipated a similar level of negative impacts. Respondents were broken into high and low level groups on knowledge of EXPO and EXPO political activity, but no significant differences were found between these high and low groups on their beliefs about potential positive or negative social impacts. The same result was found when the sample was divided into elderly versus nonelderly, and home owners versus renters. Respondents who reported a high quality of life anticipated a greater likelihood of positive impacts, when compared to the low quality of life group, but beliefs about negative impacts were similar. However, the relationship between the perceived likelihood of social impacts and attitudes toward EXPO 82 was stronger for respondents in the high quality of life and high knowledge of EXPO groups, when compared to the low groups, respectively.

The results of the path analysis showed that EXPO political efficacy, importance of information sources, race and attitudes toward EXPO 82 were all related to the perceived likelihood of potential social impacts resulting from EXPO 82. Attitudes toward EXPO 82 were also found to be influenced by the respondents' perceived EXPO political efficacy, race, and beliefs about potential impacts. The path analysis also showed EXPO political activity as being dependent on respondents' knowledge of EXPO, their level of education, as well as their attitudes and perceived political efficacy in regard to EXPO 82.

The results indicated the usefulness of alienation theory and the perspective of community psychology for the study of differential social impacts. Results were also discussed in reference to the literature on differential social impacts. Finally, the relevance of the proposed model for future differential analysis of social impacts was discussed.

Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major
Psychology
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Thesis80b.M458.pdf

Size

10.82 MB

Format

Unknown

Checksum (MD5)

ff026ce27ef63aea8cbfa425d1635914


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science