Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals
Source Publication
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Date Issued
January 1, 2010
Author(s)
Shattell, M.M.
Chinn, P.
Thomas, Sandra
Cowling, W.R.
Abstract
This study examined the quality of peer review in three scholarly nursing journals from the perspectives of authors and editors. Specifically, the study examined the extent to which manuscript reviews provided constructive guidance for authors to further develop their work for publication, and for editors to make informed and sound decisions on the disposition of manuscripts.
Disciplines
Recommended Citation
Shattell, M.M., Chinn, P., Thomas, S.P., & Cowling, W.R. (2010). Authors’ and editors’ perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 42, 58-65.
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Name
author_editor.pdf
Size
182.79 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
bbfcb14ff5b6dd0f96e095f5d3071008