Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. Examining Values Through Aphorisms
Details

Examining Values Through Aphorisms

Date Issued
August 1, 2003
Author(s)
Hebb, Lauriann L
Advisor(s)
Warren H. Jones
Additional Advisor(s)
Howard Pollio
Lowell Gaertner
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/37893
Abstract

Many psychologists agree that studying values is an important aspect of understanding human nature (Allport, Rokeach, etc.). In spite of this consensus, there is little collective research on the subject. This is due, in part, to variations in instruments.
Therefore, the purpose of the present research was to (a) assess the underlying structure of responses to a set of aphorisms, (b) to examine potential reasons for differential endorsement and (c) to explore the relationship between a set of aphorisms and traditional psychosocial measure of values as well as personality.
Study 1 included 928 participants, and the objective was to examine the structure underlying responses to a set of aphorisms (Laws of Life; LL). Classic psychometric tests yielded 5 factors: Direction in life, Positivity, Self-Control, Reciprocity and Cognitive Determinism.
Study 2 (n =258) focused on the explanation for differential endorsement rates. Results showed that the best predictor of endorsement rate was how relevant a particular item was to the participant.
Study 3 (n =193) compared the LL to other measures of values in an attempt to assess the extent of the relationship between this set of aphorisms and traditional psychological measures. Results indicated a moderate convergence between the LL factors and measures of values, with Direction in life showing to be the strongest and most extensively related factor.
The purpose of Study 4 (N = 318) was to assess the relationship between the LL factors and relevant measures of personality. The five factors showed a degree of variability among the personality constructs. Again, Direction in life showed to be the factor that showed the most convergence, whereas Cognitive Determinism showed no reliable relation to any of the personality constructs.
This research attempted to examine an existing set of aphorisms and use this set in order to provide insight about the nature of values. Results showed that these aphorisms are related to both measures of values as well as measures of personality.

Disciplines
Psychology
Degree
Master of Arts
Major
Psychology
Embargo Date
August 1, 2003
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

HebbLauriann.pdf

Size

106.67 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

de2bc024bf0b1dffc473614f4ab87f8e

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify