Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. Sidestick Controllers During High Gain Tasks
Details

Sidestick Controllers During High Gain Tasks

Date Issued
August 1, 2002
Author(s)
Goszkowicz, Brian J.
Advisor(s)
Dr. R. Kimberlin
Additional Advisor(s)
Dr. U. P. Solies, Dr. Fred Stellar
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/37989
Abstract

This research attempts to demonstrate the feasibility of a sidestick controller in a high gain environment. The research is assembled from several historical precedents and various projects.


New technologies have re-ignited interest in the use of sidestick controllers for commercial and military aircraft. There are many advantages and disadvantages utilizing a sidestick in fighter aircraft. Many pilots prefer the feel of a centerstick controller and the designer only needs to develop a few sets of command gradients or gearings to produce adequate handling qualities. However, centersticks require more cockpit room due to their larger size and range of motion. Consequently, designers would have a difficult time fitting a centerstick in small cockpits such as the F-16. The presence of a centerstick could obstruct the view of a center panel Multi-Function Display, preventing the pilot from quickly assimilating valuable information. Sidestick controllers are lightweight, ncan fit in small cockpits, and are better suited for aircraft capable of sustained high normal load factors. From a pilot-vehicle interface standpoint, sidesticks offer an unobstructed view of displays, a clear pathway during an emergency cockpit egress, and allows access to full command inputs for the diverse statures of today’s pilots.

The sidestick controller is not without its deficiencies. A sidestick controller prevents easy access to the console under the armrest forcing the designers to use that space for controls that may be set prior to flight. A sidestick also prevents the pilot from using the non-sidestick hand to control the aircraft while trying to do other tasks, such as writing on a kneeboard or using the console under the armrest. Additionally, the tendency toward PIO is more prevalent in air craft equipped with a sidestick than a centerstick. Flight test and simulation has shown that different Command Gradients and Gearings optimize performance for different tasks. However, it is not feasible to collapse the control laws into one usable set for all tasks.

Disciplines
Systems Engineering and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
Degree
Master of Science
Major
Aviation Systems
Embargo Date
August 1, 2002
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

GoskowiczBrian.pdf

Size

809.15 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

0fa1c9939caa558426485cc96bd0b186

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Contact
  • Libraries at University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Repository logo COAR Notify