Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Colleges & Schools
  3. Graduate School
  4. Masters Theses
  5. Soil resource evaluation using precision farming techniques for selected sites in Tennessee
Details

Soil resource evaluation using precision farming techniques for selected sites in Tennessee

Date Issued
August 1, 1999
Author(s)
Gehl, Ronald J.
Advisor(s)
Donald D. Tyler
Additional Advisor(s)
H. Paul Denton
John B. Wilkerson
Michael D. Mullen
Permanent URI
https://trace.tennessee.edu/handle/20.500.14382/43025
Abstract

Crop yields have been shown to vary both between and within fields. Current technology allows for an accurate measurement of yield variability using Global Positioning System (GPS) and yield monitoring equipment. However, determination of the source of this variability is complicated by spatial differences in soil fertility, soil series, slope, and past management practices.


This statewide study was designed to test the effectiveness of conventional soil survey maps against an intensive soil map created for various sites in Tennessee. Field Specific soil maps were developed using intensive soil sampling, incorporated with GPS and Geographic Information System (GIS) software. Relationships between soybean yield and soil mapping units were then statistically compared using spatial correlation models and S AS proc mixed procedures. Intensive soil maps better explained soybean yield variation (α = 0.05) although neither mapping technique was strongly related to yield. The site-specific maps were also better at distinguishing distinct yield groups by individual soil mapping unit.

Specific properties of the soil and crop landscape were also investigated to determine their affect on soybean yield. Properties that had a significant affect on yield included subsoil texture, slope, and pH. Slope and subsoil texture interactions and drainage and effective rooting depth (ERD) interactions also showed yield differences. Soil properties that did not affect yield included soil drainage class, ERD, available phosphorous, and available potassium. Interactions of ERD and subsoil texture, ERD and slope, drainage and subsoil texture, and drainage and slope also showed no yield differences.

Results of this study indicate that conventional mapping methods may not provide the necessary detail for use in today's precision farming applications. When investigating specific properties within soil units, a limit is set in explaining yield variation by the soil unit boundary and further variability related to the soil unit cannot be explained. Although site specific maps are better than conventional mapping methods at predicting yields, an investigation into specific soil properties within a field may be necessary in providing a useful tool for producers implementing precision farming crop management.

Degree
Master of Science
Major
Plant, Soil and Environmental Sciences
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

uc_id_1e_BZJzltGo9IQRajasPk7Yh968l80gkf_export_download.pdf

Size

11.52 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

a7af1ee6c1cd17847f5e503ee7a4ce3a


University Libraries

1015 Volunteer Boulevard
Knoxville, TN 37996
865-974-4351

Map & Directions
Donate to the Libraries
  • About
  • John C. Hodges Society
  • Speaking Volumes magazine
  • Outreach
  • Directory
  • Employment
  • Policies
  • Library Intranet
University of Tennessee power T logo

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

Events
A-Z
Apply
Privacy
Map
Directory
Give to UT
Accessibility

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science