Student-produced media and free expression in Tennessee public high schools in 1994

This study was conducted to understand the present condition of student media in the public high schools of Tennessee. It describes the perceived importance of freedom of expression by student editors, media advisers, principals, and superintendents. It also examines how these groups view the flow of communication patterns among these involved with student media.

Survey results show that most student editors and media advisers view journalism in general as "very important," but at their own schools, only "somewhat important." Principals and superintendents view journalism in general as "important." Respondents reported a low level of controversy. Only eleven respondents reported any type of controversy that suggests a controlled student media. Only two student editors, one media adviser, one principal, and seven superintendents reported that they felt they could discuss advising problems with school board members and other individuals involved with student media. Results are reported in percentages and cross-table tabulations.

This paper also makes suggestions for improving journalism in the high schools and writing policies based on five other states that have passed legislation for free expression.